Urmil vs State Of Pb

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Urmil vs State Of Pb on 1 April, 2024

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:043374




                                                          2024:PHHC:043374

[1914]       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                  CWP-7153-2004
                                  Date of Decision : 01.04.2024

Urmil                                                       ...Petitioner

             versus

The State of Punjab and another                             ....Respondents

Coram :      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY

Present :    Mr. Vishal, Advocate for the petitioner.
             Mr. Charan Preet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
             ***

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

[1] This petition has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other suitable writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned order dated 12.06.2002 (Annexure P-2). [2] Learned counsel submits that the husband of petitioner had been dismissed from the service on account of conviction dated 13.05.2001 in FIR No.48 dated 28.05.1995. However, now during the pendency of the present petition, he has been since acquitted of the charges by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.CRA-S-400-SB-2001 vide judgment dated 20.04.2011. Though representation had been submitted previously for reconsideration of punishment in view of the said development, however, a fresh representation will be submitted by the petitioner, which may be directed to be decided within a time bound manner.

[4] Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.

[5] In view of the aforesaid and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction that in 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 09:01:56 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:043374 2024:PHHC:043374 CWP-7153-2004 -2- case the petitioner submits a representation within a period of 4 weeks, the same shall be decided by the respondents taking into account the pleas of the petitioner raised therein, expeditiously and if found entitled, necessary benefit be granted to her forthwith. However, in the eventuality of the relief being denied, a speaking order be passed, after associating her therewith.

                                                  (AMAN CHAUDHARY)
                                                      JUDGE

01.04.2024
'R. Sharma'

                     Whether speaking/ reasoned   :    Yes/No
                     Whether reportable           :    Yes/No




                                   2 of 2
              ::: Downloaded on - 06-04-2024 09:01:57 :::