2023:PHHC:084498
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
At Chandigarh
CWP-12100-2020 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-05.07.2023
Khajan and others ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:- Mr. A.S.Aulakh, Advocate for
Mr. Hitesh Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Samarth Sagar, Addl. AG, Haryana.
Mr. Sandeep Siwach, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
*****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
1. Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners has requested for an adjournment on the ground that arguing counsel is indisposed. However, this Court finds that the matter has been adjourned repeatedly. On the last date of hearing the following order was passed:
"A perusal of the earlier orders would reflect that counsel appearing for the petitioner has been seeking time to address arguments.
There is no representation for the petitioners. Last opportunity is allowed to the counsel for the petitioners to address arguments, failing which the writ petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.
MOHAN SINGH 2023.07.05 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-12100-2020 (O&M) (2) 2023:PHHC:084498 Adjourned to 29.11.2022."
2. Having regard to the aforesaid order and the fact that even today, a request for adjournment has been made, the instant petition is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.
05.07.2023 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL )
mohan JUDGE
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable Yes / No
MOHAN SINGH
2023.07.05 20:05
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgment