IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(232) CRR-36-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision:- 02.11.2022
Ram Parvesh ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:- None.
...
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
Instant revision petition has been filed under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order dated 18.11.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, whereby the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Section 4 read with Section 18 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short "the POCSO Act") as well as under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Copy of judgment dated 03.09.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court (POCSO), Panipat is taken on record. An examination, thereof, shows that the petitioner-Ram Parvesh has been acquitted of the charges framed against him.
Instant petition, is therefore, rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
02.11.2022 JUDGE
Kamal
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
1 of 1
::: Downloaded on - 04-11-2022 01:25:49 :::