Jagjit Kaur And Anr vs Ajay Partap Singh

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6544 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jagjit Kaur And Anr vs Ajay Partap Singh on 11 July, 2022
                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH


                           304                                           CR No.8157 of 2019
                                                                         Date of Decision : 11.07.2022

                           Jagjit Kaur and Anr.                                              ....Petitioners

                                                              VERSUS

                           Ajay Partap Singh                                                ....Respondent

                           CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

                           Present :   None.

                           ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

On 18.12.2019, the following order was passed :

"Learned counsel for the petitioners-landlord inter alia contends that Appellate Authority vide impugned order dated 01.11.2019 (Annexure P-1) has illegally ordered to retain half of the amount of 42.00 lakh and future rent on deposit by the respondent-tenant and remaining half for payment to the appellants against their undertaking. In fact, vide compromise dated 17.10.2016, respondent-tenant himself agreed to pay rent @ 1,50,000/- per month. Thus, entire amount of arrears of rent ought to have been ordered to be disbursed to the petitioners immediately on deposit of same by the respondent-tenant.

Notice of motion for 16.4.2020 through ordinary process, registered cover and dasti as well on furnishing correct particulars, requisite number of copies of the paper-book, registered cover, process fee and incidental expenses, if any, within two weeks.

In case of non-compliance of this order in its letter and JITENDER KUMAR 2022.07.12 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CR No.8157 of 2019 -2- spirit, this revision shall positively be dismissed for want of prosecution."

As per office report, notice could not be issued to the respondent as the process fee, registered cover and requisite copies of the paper-book were not filed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the order dated 18.12.2019, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present revision petition for non-prosecution.

Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2022.07.12 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh