Karthikeyan vs The Inspector Of Police

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2766 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Karthikeyan vs The Inspector Of Police on 22 May, 2026

                                                                                CRL OP No.13376 of 2026


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                      DATED: 22-05-2026
                                                          CORAM
                                      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
                                                  CRL OP No.13376 of 2026

                 1. Karthikeyan
                    S/o. Selvam,
                    No.5/228, Panaikulam,
                    Dharmapuri – 636 809.

                 2. Divya
                    D/o.Murugan
                    No.191, Nallappanayakanaalli,
                    A Papparapatti,
                    Papparapatti,
                    Dharmapuri - 636 809.
                                                                               ...Petitioners/Accused

                                                             Vs
                 State Rep. by,
                 The Inspector of Police,
                 Palacode Police Station,
                 Dharmapuri District.
                 (Crime No.170 of 2026)                                   ...Respondent/Complainant


                Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
                Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying to grant pre-arrest bail to the
                petitioners in Crime No.170 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
                                  For Petitioners :        Mr.V. Sakkarapani

                                  For Respondent :         Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar
                                                           Government Advocate
                                                           (Criminal Side)




                                                                                           __________
                                                                                            Page1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              CRL OP No.13376 of 2026


                                                       ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners on 19.05.2026 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent-police for the offences punishable under Section 123 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023 r/w Section 7 of the Prohibition of the Electronics Cigarettes (Production, Manufacture, Import, Export, Transport, Sale, Distribution, Storage and Advertisement) Act, 2019, in Crime No.170 of 2026 on the file of the respondent-police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.05.2026, when the police were on patrolling, based on the secret tip, they found that the petitioners were in illegal possession of banned tobacco products such as 1.Hans, 2.Vimal, 3.V1 Tobacco Sack. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.V.Sakkarapani, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are innocent persons, they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against the petitioners. He however submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any __________ Page2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.13376 of 2026 conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Accordingly, he prays to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

5. Per contra, Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police, submits that the petitioners were found in illegal possession of banned tobacco products which are worth about Rs.1,08,000/-. He further submits that there are no previous cases against the petitioners. However, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. The petitioners have permanent residence and deep roots in the society. Hence, there is less possibility of absconding. Considering the same and also taking note of the fact that there are no previous cases against the petitioners and with a view to give an opportunity to the petitioners to reform themselves, this Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall be released on pre-arrest bail in the event of their arrest or in the event of their surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palacode, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten __________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.13376 of 2026 Thousand only) each along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palacode.

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity.

(iii) The petitioners shall appear and sign before the respondent-police weekly twice i.e., on every Monday, and Friday at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

(iv) The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(v) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

(vi) The petitioners shall also not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant, his family members and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence.

(vii) The petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

(viii) The petitioners shall furnish their residential address and mobile number to the concerned Magistrate.

__________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.13376 of 2026

(ix) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate or Trial Court, as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by them as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

22-05-2026 dk/srm Note:-

1.Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.
2.All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No.13376 of 2026 R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

dk/srm To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Palacode.

2. The Inspector of Police, Palacode Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

CRL OP No. 13376 of 2026

22-05-2026 __________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis