A.S.No.661 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
A.S.No.661 of 2016
1. Senthilkumar
2. Sudha
3. Muthammal @ Saroja ... Appellants
Versus
Minor Sarathkumar
by next friend grand-father
Venkatachalam ... Respondent
Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure to
allow the above Regular Appeal and set aside the judgment and decree, dated
19.11.2015 made in O.S.No.177 of 2012 on the file of the Additional District
Court at Namakkal.
For Appellants : No Appearance
For Respondent : No Appearance
JUDGMENT
In this matter, on 09.09.2022, this Court took into consideration that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants on several occasions and in fact, the matter was posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 29.07.2022, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/3 A.S.No.661 of 2016 on which date, again the learned Counsel for the appellants appeared and requested for time. At his request, a long date from July, 2022 to September, 2022 was given for getting instructions. Thereafter, on the last occasion, once again, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. In that view of the matter, the matter was specifically posted under the caption "for dismissal" today. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
19.09.2022 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs To The Additional District Court, Namakkal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/3 A.S.No.661 of 2016 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY. J., grs A.S.No.661 of 2016 19.09.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/3