M.Indhumathi vs N.Anandh

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15503 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022

Madras High Court
M.Indhumathi vs N.Anandh on 19 September, 2022
                                                                          TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 19.09.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                              TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022
                                                         and
                                               C.M.P(MD).No.4728 of 2022

                     M.Indhumathi                                          ... Petitioner

                                                          versus

                     N.Anandh                                               ... Respondent


                                  Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24
                     C.P.C. to withdraw the case in I.D.O.P.No.32 of 2022 from the file of
                     the Principal District Court, Pudukottai and transfer the same to the
                     Family Court, Sivagangai, or any other competent court in Sivagangai
                     within the time stipulated by this Court.


                                        For Petitioner       : Mr.S.Malaikani
                                        For Respondent       : Mr.V.Sukumar




                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking transfer of the case in I.D.O.P.No.32 of 2022 from the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai.

2. The petitioner herein is the wife and the respondent herein is the husband. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 17.09.2015, as per the Christian Rites and Customs and out of the wedlock, they are blessed with two children. Due to some misunderstanding, now, they are living separately. Thereafter, the respondent filed I.D.O.P.No.32 of 2022 before the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, for divorce. The petitioner has also filed I.D.O.P.No.43 of 2022 before the Family Court, Sivagangai, for restitution of conjugal rights. Now, the petitioner and her children are living along with her old-aged parents at Salaigramam. Since the 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022 petitioner alone has to take care of her children and her old-aged parents, she finds it difficult to travel from Salaigramam to Pudukottai. Hence, she filed the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in I.D.O.P.No.32 of 2022 from the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the distance between Salaigramam and Pudukottai is around 104 kms. He further submits that the petitioner is not having sufficient means to travel and she depends upon her parents to meet out her day-to-day expenses. Since she alone has to take care of her children and her aged parents and there is no one to accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel from Salaigramam to Pudukottai for appearing before the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, for each and every hearing.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah vs- Virendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in (2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over the convenience of the husband.

6. This Court being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and also taking into consideration that the convenience of wife is to be taken into consideration at the time of considering transfer petitions as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited supra, is inclined to allow the present petition.

7. In the light of the above, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022 petition stands allowed. The proceedings in I.D.O.P.No.32 of 2022 pending on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukottai, is withdrawn and ordered to be transferred to the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai. The Principal District Court, Pudukottai, is directed to transmit the entire case records to the Family Court, Sivagangai, forthwith. The learned Judge, Family Court, Sivagangai, shall dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

19.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy To

1. The Principal District Court, Pudukottai.

2. The Family Court, Sivagangai.

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022 B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy TR.C.M.P(MD).No.279 of 2022 19.09.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis