The Manager vs Tmt.Palaniammal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14922 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2022

Madras High Court
The Manager vs Tmt.Palaniammal on 7 September, 2022
                                                                      C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 07.09.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

                                              C.M.A(MD)No.1177 of 2009
                                                       and
                                                M.P(MD) No.3 of 2009


                     The Manager,
                     National Insurance Company Limited,
                     Gopichettipalayam.                                       ... Appellant
                                                        vs.

                     1.Tmt.Palaniammal
                       W/o. Kalimuthu

                     2.Balan,
                       S/o.Muthupandi                                     ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor
                     Vehicles Act, to set aside the order and decree dated 08.03.2007 passed
                     in M.A.C.O.P.No.130 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
                     Tribunal, Sub Court, Palani.


                                     For Appellant       : Mr.D.Sivaraman

                                     For R1              : Mr.S.Karthik

                                     For R2              : No appearance



                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009

                                                         JUDGMENT

************ This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed to set aside the order and decree in M.C.O.P.No.130 of 2001, dated 08.03.2007, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Palani.

2.The appellant / Insurance Company is the respondent in M.C.O.P.No.130 of 2001. The first respondent / claimant filed the claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Sub Court), Palani, claiming a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation, for the injuries sustained by her, in the accident that took place on 20.02.2001.

3. The Tribunal, after considering the oral and documentary evidences and arguments made on either side, partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a sum of Rs.41,000/- with 6% interest per annum as compensation to the claimant. Against which, the appellant/Insurance Company has filed this present appeal.

4.I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel for the first respondent and perused all the materials 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009 available on record.

6. The contention of the appellant is that the Tribunal without appreciating the documentary evidence available, came to the conclusion that the driver of van bearing Registration No.TN-36-A-7880 was responsible for the accident and no independent witness was examined to prove the involvement of the vehicle in the accident. Further, he submitted that the award amount is highly excessive.

7.These contentions are not acceptable. From the materials available on record, it is seen that the Tribunal properly appreciating both oral and documentary evidence and held that the driver of the van is responsible for the accident, which is insured with the appellant/Insurance Company. The Tribunal considering the nature of injuries and percentage of disability, awarded a total sum of Rs.41,000/- as compensation, which is not excessive.

8.In the considered opinion of this Court, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable compensation and the appellant did not let in any contra evidence to disprove the case. The 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009 appellant has not made out any case for modifying or reducing the compensation as awarded by the Tribunal.

9.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is confirmed. The appellant / Insurance Company is directed to deposit the entire award amount to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.130 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Palani, less the amount already deposited, if any, along with accrued interests and costs, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgment. On such deposit being made, the first respondent / claimant is permitted to withdraw the award amount, less the amount already withdrawn, if any, with accrued interest by making necessary application before the Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.09.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No cp 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009 To

1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Palani.

2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P(MD) No.1177 of 2009 A.A.NAKKIRAN .,J.

cp JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.1177 of 2009 07.09.2022 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis