D. Hemamalini vs The State Of Tamil Nadu

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14805 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2022

Madras High Court
D. Hemamalini vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 5 September, 2022
                                                                                   W.P. No. 10983 of 2022



                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                           DATED : 05.09.2022

                                                  CORAM

                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

                                          W.P. No. 10983 of 2022
                                                   and
                                         W.M.P.No. 10567 of 2022
           D. Hemamalini
                                                                                ... Petitioner
                                                      Vs.
           1. The State of Tamil Nadu
              Represented by its Secretary,
              Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department,
              Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

           2. The State of Tamil Nadu,
              Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government,
              Health & Family Welfare Department,
              Secretariat, Fort St. George,
              Chennai – 600 009.

           3. The Director of Drugs Control,
              Chennai – 600 006.

           4. The Secretary,
              Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
              TNPSC Road, Chennai – 600003.
                                                                                ... Respondents
                          Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the
               issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to prepare the
               seniority list for the purpose of promotion to the post of Senior Analyst and
               further promotion on the basis of merit i.e the marks scored in the selection by
               TNPSC for appointment to the post of Junior Analyst without considering the
               communal roster points/order of communal rotation stimulated in the selection
               list prepared by the TNPSC for appointment to the post of Junior Analyst in the
               Tamil Nadu Medical Service 2009-10 & 2011-12s by considering objection
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis




           1/5
                                                                                    W.P. No. 10983 of 2022



                made by the petitioner dated 07.04.2022 and in accordance with law within a
                time to be stipulated by this Court.

                                  For Petitioner  : Mr. P. Ganesan
                                  For Respondents : Mrs. M. Geetha thamaraiselvam
                                                    Special Government Pleader
                                                    for R1 to R3
                                                    Ms. C.N.G. Niraimathi
                                                    Standing Counsel for TNPSC
                                                    for R4

                                                       ORDER

Pursuant to the seniority list published by the respondent, on 07.04.2022, petitioner has sent objection to the respondents, to consider the said seniority list only on the basis of merit i.e. marks secured by them to the appointment of new Junior Analyst, without taking note of the communal roster points/order of communal rotation for appointment to the post of new Junior Analyst, in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLA Nos. 2861- 2876 of 2020, confirming the judgment passed by this Court in the case of K. Raja and Others vs Additional Chief Secretary to Government and another reported in (2019 (6) CTC page 750), wherein this Court has held that roster point cannot be the basis for seniority giving adequate reasons both on law and fact and declared Sections 1(2), 40(1) and 70 of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants Service (Conditions of Service) Act 2016 as ultra vires and unconstitutional. But so far, the petitioner's objection has not been considered by the respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 W.P. No. 10983 of 2022

2. The learned Government Pleader for the respondents, submitted that the said objection of the petitioner, will be considered by the respondents by taking into account the applications pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

3. In the light of the above, this Court will not go into merits of the case. However, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's objection dated 07.04.2022 and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law by taking into consideration the decision sited supra, as early as possible, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time the respondents shall not finalise the promotion to the post of Junior Analyst to Senior Analyst.

4. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                               05.09.2022
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes/ No
                mrn




                To
                1. The Secretary,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 W.P. No. 10983 of 2022 The State of Tamil Nadu Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

2. The Principal Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Health & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

3. The Director of Drugs Control, Chennai – 600 006.

4. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, Chennai – 600003.

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 W.P. No. 10983 of 2022 (mrn) W.P. No. 10983 of 2022 and W.M.P.No. 10567 of 2022 05.09.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5