R.Eswar vs State Rep.By Inspector Of Police

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9321 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2022

Madras High Court
R.Eswar vs State Rep.By Inspector Of Police on 18 May, 2022
                                                                                    Crl.O.P.No.9578 of 2022


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 18.5.2022

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                                 CRL.O.P No.9578 of 2022
                                                           and
                                             Crl.M.P Nos.5615 & 5616 of 2022


              R.Eswar                                                      ...    Petitioner

                                                           Vs.

              1.State Rep.by Inspector of Police
                Central Crime Branch, EDF-1,
                Aani-1, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.                      ..         1st respondent/
                                                                                 Complainant

              2.Putta Suru Babu                                       ..         2nd respondent /
                                                                                 Defacto Complainant


              PRAYER :             Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal
              Procedure Code, praying to call for the records and quash the impunged
              proceedings in C.C.No.349 of 2022 on the file of the Court of CCB and
              CBCID Cases, Chennai at Egmore and quash the same with respect to the
              petitioner.


                                   For Petitioner         : Mr.J.Hariharan
                                   For Respondent-1       : Mr.E.Raj Thilak
                                                            Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                          1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               Crl.O.P.No.9578 of 2022


                                                   ORDER

This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated by the first respondent against the petitioner under Sections 406, 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all factual in nature and they require appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal appearance of the petitioner is dispensed with in connection with C.C.No.349 of 2022 on the file of the Court of CCB and CBCID Cases, Chennai at Egmore and he shall be represented by a counsel, who shall 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9578 of 2022 cross examine the witnesses on the same day when they are examined in chief. The petitioner shall be present before the Court below at the time of questioning under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code and at the time of passing of the final judgment.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in CC.No.349 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible and it shall not be later than four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The trial shall be conducted on a day-to-day basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist upon the presence of the petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambhu Nath Singh [JT 2001 (4) SC 3191]. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

18.5.2022 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9578 of 2022 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J RS To

1.The Court of CCB and CBCID Cases, Chennai at Egmore

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

3. The Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch, EDF-1, Aani-1, Vepery, Chennai-600 007 CRL.O.P.No.9578 of 2022 18.5.2022 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis