Nagarajan vs The General Manager

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15428 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021

Madras High Court
Nagarajan vs The General Manager on 2 August, 2021
                                                                      W.P.No.15868 of 2021

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 02.08.2021

                                                  CORAM
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

                                               W.P.No.15868 of 2021

                 1.Nagarajan
                 2.S.Subramaian
                 3.S.A.Rajendran
                 4.A.Sekar
                 5.K.Raji
                 6.K.Kandavel
                 7.R.Thennarasu
                 8.M.Kumar
                 9.V.Sengalvarayan
                 10.P.Chandrasekaran
                 11.K.M.Elumalai
                 12.D.Gnana Gunasekaran
                 13.S.Palani
                 14.S. Singaravelan
                 15.E.Kamaraj
                 16.R.Araselangovan
                 17.C.Vadivelu
                 18.V.Panneerselvam
                 19.R.Selvaraja
                 20.G.Velayutham
                 21.A.Elangovan
                 22.R.Nandagopal
                 23.R. Thirunavukkarasu
                 24.S.Balathandayutham
                 25. N.Uppenthran
                 26.S.Everest
                 27.P. Jayaraman                                          ... Petitioners

                                                       -vs-

                 Page No.1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/   of 6
                                                                                 W.P.No.15868 of 2021

                 1.The General Manager,
                   Tamil Nadu State Transport
                   Corporation (Villupuram-III) Ltd.,
                   Thiruvannamalai Region,
                   Bye Pass Road, Vengikkal,
                   Thiruvannamalai District – 606 604.

                 2. The Administrator,
                    Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                    Employees Pension Fund Trust,
                    Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.                         ... Respondents


                 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India

                 praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to

                 pay interest @ 10% for the belated payment of gratuity, Leave Salary and

                 commutation of pension amount to the petitioners.

                           For Petitioners           :Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu
                           For Respondents           :Mr.C.S.K.Sathish
                                                      Standing Counsel for Transport Corporation

                                                      ORDER

With the consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, learned Standing Counsel for Transport Corporation takes notice for the respondents. Page No.2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ of 6 W.P.No.15868 of 2021

3. The petitioners herein, who retired from the services of the Respondents Corporation on reaching the age of superannuation, have come up with the above Writ Petition, seeking a direction to the Respondents to pay interest at 10% for the belated payment of gratuity, leave salary, commutation of pension and other benefits for the period from the date of retirement of the petitioners till the date of their settlement, by following the judgment dated 12.06.2015 passed in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, order dated 13.07.2018 made in C.M.P.No.6352 of 2018 in W.A.No.665 of 2018 and the order dated 19.01.2021 made in W.P.No.15886 of 2020.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material documents available on record.

5. It is well settled in very many cases that the employee is entitled to interest for the belated payment of his retiral benefits. A Division Bench of this Court in Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue Department vs. M. Deivasigamani [2009 (3) MLJ 01] has held that the employee is entitled to interest on belated payment of Page No.3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ of 6 W.P.No.15868 of 2021 pension and other retiral benefits, even in the absence of statutory rules / administrative instructions or guidelines and that he can claim interest under Part III of the Constitution, relying on Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

6. In a similar circumstance, the First Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015 on 12.06.2015, directed the respondent / Transport Corporation to settle the terminal benefits of its employees in equal monthly installments and to pay 6% interest on the terminal benefits payable to the workman. It has also held that the workman is entitled to 18% interest for the defaulted period of installments.

7. Following the above judgments, a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.15886 of 2020 on 19.01.2021, directed the respondent / Transport Corporation to pay interest @ 6% per annum, for the belated payment of gratuity and other retiral benefits.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of delay, this Court is inclined to grant interest @ 4% Page No.4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ of 6 W.P.No.15868 of 2021 per annum, for the belated payment of gratuity, leave salary and commutation of pension amount that are yet to be settled, in four equal monthly installments, commencing from 01.10.2021. In case of delay in making installments within the time stipulated supra, the interest payable could be 10% for the delayed period to be recovered from the Officer responsible for disbursement of the amount.

9. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to pay interest would not preclude the petitioner / workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled.

10. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation and direction. No costs.



                                                                                         02.08.2021
                 Index                    :    Yes/No
                 Internet                 :    Yes/No
                 (gv)

                 Page No.5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ of 6 W.P.No.15868 of 2021 A.A.NAKKIRAN., J.

(gv) To:

1.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transpor Corporation (Villupuram-III) Ltd., Thiruvannamalai Region, Bye Pass Road, Vengikkal, Thiruvannamalai District – 606 604.

2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

W.P.No.15868 of 2021 02.08.2021 Page No.6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ of 6