Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kashiram Kuswaha vs Uday Namdev on 9 May, 2024
Author: Dinesh Kumar Paliwal
Bench: Dinesh Kumar Paliwal
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
MA No. 5713 of 2022
(KASHIRAM KUSWAHA Vs UDAY NAMDEV AND OTHERS)
Dated : 09-05-2024
Shri Rajendra Yadav - Advocate for the appellant.
Shri Abhinav Sunil Khirdikar - Advocate for respondent
No.3/insurance company.
None for the respondent No.2 despite service of notice.
Appeal against respondent No.1 has already been dismissed as appellant failed to take appropriate steps regarding furnishing correct address of respondent No.1 for service of notice upon him vide order dated 02.05.2024 of Registrar (J-I) of this Court.
Heard on I.A. No.14587/2022, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay caused in presentation of present appeal.
As per office note, this appeal has been preferred after a delay of 48 days.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.3/Insurance Company has not opposed the prayer for condoning the delay.
For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of the appellant and non-opposition of counsel for respondent No.3/Insurance Company, I.A. No.14587 of 2022 is allowed. The delay caused in presentation of present appeal is hereby condoned.
Also heard on the question of admission. Record of the Claims Tribunal perused.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Signing time: 5/9/2024 7:50:12 PM 2Prima facie, this appeal seems to be arguable, hence, admitted for hearing.
Learned counsel for the parties are heard finally. Judgment passed, signed and dated separately.
(DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL) JUDGE @shish Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR JAIN Signing time: 5/9/2024 7:50:12 PM