Muhammedkutty vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2263 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2025

Kerala High Court

Muhammedkutty vs State Of Kerala on 5 August, 2025

                                                                       1




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
  TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1947
                       CRL.MC NO. 4891 OF 2025
   CRIME NO.483/2006 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD
        SC   NO.416   OF   2021   OF   ADDITIONAL   DISTRICT   COURT   &
SESSIONS COURT-IV, PALAKKAD / III ADDITIONAL MACT, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

             MUHAMMEDKUTTY​
             AGED 53 YEARS​
             S/O HAMSA, EYYAMMAKKAL HOUSE, VILATHUR, NADUVATTOM,
             TIRUVEGAPPURA, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
             PIN - 679304


             BY ADVS. ​
             SRI.P.K.MOHANAN(PALAKKAD)​
             SHRI.THAREEQ ANVER​



RESPONDENTS/STATE & DE FACTO COMPLAINANT:

    1        STATE OF KERALA​
             REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
             ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2        SAIDALAVI @ MANU​
             AGED 74 YEARS​
             S/O MUHAMMED @ MAMMAD, KUNNUMPURATH HOUSE, (POST)
             TIRUVEGAPPURA, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
             PIN - 679304



             SRI SUDHEER G., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 05.08.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                                            2025:KER:58492
Crl.M.C 4891/2025
​    ​    ​    ​         ​      ​
                                      2


                                    ORDER

​ The petitioner is the accused in SC No.416/2021 on the files of Additional Sessions Court IV, Palakkad. He faces criminal prosecution for the commission of offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

2.​ The prosecution case is that, after the marriage of the petitioner with one Fathimath Suhara on 16.09.1999, his mother and sister subjected the above lady to severe physical and mental cruelty, which the petitioner supported. It is stated that the above cruelty was perpetrated at a time when the petitioner was working abroad. It is further alleged that, at the time when the petitioner came down to his residence, he joined his mother and sister to subject the above said lady to physical and mental cruelty. As a result of the alleged persistent cruelty perpetrated upon the above lady, she committed suicide along with her 4 year old son by jumping in front of a train on 27.09.2006. Accordingly, the petitioner, his mother and sister were booked by the Pattambi Police for the commission of offences under Sections 498A and 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. After the completion of the investigation, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Shornur, filed the Final Report against the aforesaid three persons.

                                                             2025:KER:58492
Crl.M.C 4891/2025
​    ​    ​    ​         ​      ​
                                      3

3.​ The accused Nos.2 and 3, who are the mother and sister of the petitioner herein, faced the trial in SC No.85/2010 on the files of Additional Sessions Court Fast Track No.II, Palakkad. The case against the petitioner herein was split up, since his presence could not be procured during trial in the said case. After a full fledged trial, with the examination of six witnesses as PW1 to PW6, and marking 16 documents as P1 to P16, the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the accused Nos.2 and 3 under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C, with the finding that there was not even an iota of evidence to connect the accused persons with the offences alleged in the Crime. Now, in the present petition, the petitioner would contend that the case pending before the Additional Sessions Court IV, Palakkad, as SC No.416/2021, against him in connection with the same Crime, is liable to be quashed in view of the findings of the Additional Sessions Court Fast Track II, Palakkad, in SC No.85 of 2010.

4.​ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

5.​ Annexure A5 is the judgment dated 03.07.2013 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track Court II, Palakkad, in SC No.85/2010. It could be seen from the aforesaid judgment that the three pivotal witnesses examined by the prosecution as PW2 to PW4 for 2025:KER:58492 Crl.M.C 4891/2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 4 establishing the allegations levelled against the accused, turned hostile and discredited the prosecution story. None of the above witnesses made any statement before the Trial Court that any of the accused resorted to any physical and mental cruelty upon the deceased Fathimath Suhara. Even the suicide note and diary writings were disputed by the above witnesses, which compelled the prosecution to declare those witnesses as hostile. It is after evaluating the above facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence on record, that the learned Additional Sessions Judge came to the finding that there was not even an iota of evidence to connect the accused with the crime. It is pertinent to note that, when compared with the nature of the allegations levelled against the accused Nos.2 and 3, the allegations against the petitioner herein is of less gravity. Since it is seen that the Trial Court, after a full fledged trial, has found that there is absolutely nothing on record to connect the accused Nos.2 and 3 in the Crime with the offence alleged, it has to be concluded that the entire substratum of the prosecution case is collapsed. In that view of the matter, the continuance of prosecution proceedings against the petitioner herein would serve no purpose. The termination of the prosecution proceedings against the petitioner is highly necessary to save the precious judicial time and to avoid the abuse of process of law. Therefore, the prayer of the petitioner to 2025:KER:58492 Crl.M.C 4891/2025 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 5 quash the proceedings against him, has to be allowed.

In the result, the petition stands allowed. The proceedings against the petitioner (accused) in SC No.416/2021 on the files of Additional Sessions Court-IV, Palakkad, which arose out of Crime No.483/2006 of Pattambi Police Station, Palakkad, are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

                                                  G.GIRISH
                                                   JUDGE
IAP
                                                  2025:KER:58492
Crl.M.C 4891/2025
​    ​    ​    ​    ​      ​
                                6



                APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 4891/2025

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

Annexure A1             TRUE COPY OF THE FIR AND FIS IN PATTAMBI
                        POLICE STATION DATED 27.09.2006 SUBMITTED
                        BEFORE    THE   SUB   DIVISIONAL   MAGISTRATE,
                        OTTAPALAM
Annexure A2             TRUE COPY OF CASE DIARY CONTAINING THE
                        MAHASSARS,    INQUEST   REPORT,  POST   MORTEM
                        REPORTS AND STATEMENTS OF THE WITNESSES
                        RECORDED U/S 161 CR.P.C. IN PATTAMBI POLICE
                        STATION CRIME NUMBER 483 OF 2006
Annexure A3             CERTIFIED COPY OF THE POLICE CHARGE AND
                        MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE IN PATTAMBI POLICE
                        STATION CRIME NO.483/2006
Annexure A4             CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITIONS OF PW2 TO 4

DATED 11.06.2013 IN S.C.85/2010 ON THE FILES OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURT NO.II, PALAKKAD Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE PARENT CASE S.C. 85/2010 DATED 03.07.2013 ON THE FILES OF THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURT N.II, PALAKKAD