Kerala High Court
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Company ... vs Padmakumar on 1 August, 2025
M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020
1
2025:KER:57434
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2025 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1947
MACA NO. 323 OF 2020
AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 27.08.2019 IN OPMV NO.1284 OF
2016 ON THE FILE OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,
KOLLAM.
APPELLANT/3RD RESPONDENT:
HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
5TH FLOOR,
BISHOP JEROME NAGAR JUNCTION,
CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM,
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER(LEGAL),
REGIONAL OFFICE,
RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-11
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (SR.)
SMT.K.S.SANTHI
SMT.ALEXY AUGUSTINE
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS:
1 PADMAKUMAR
AGED 58 YEARS,
S/O SUKUMARA PILLAI,
EDASSERI PUTHEN VEEDU,
MIDAPPALLY, CHITTOOR,
EDAPALLYCOTTA P.O,
PANMANA VILLAGE,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691583.
M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020
2
2025:KER:57434
2 VISHNU
AGED 28 YEARS,
S/O PADMAKUMAR,
EDASSERY PUTHENVEEDU,
MIDAPPALLY, CHITTOR,
EDAPPALLY COTTA P.O, PANMANA,
KOLLAM, PIN -691583.
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
HEARING ON 01.08.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020
3
2025:KER:57434
C.S.SUDHA, J.
----------------------------------------------------
M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020
----------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of August 2025
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act) by the third respondent/insurer in O.P.(MV) No.1284/2016 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kollam (the Tribunal), aggrieved by Award dated 27/08/2019. The respondents herein are the claim petitioners in the petition. In this appeal, the parties and the documents will be referred to as described in the original petition.
2. The claim petitioners are the husband and son of deceased Omana. According to the claim petitioners, on 15/05/2016 at 06:30 p.m., while the deceased was pillion riding on motorcycle bearing registration no.KL-2-W-6343 through Kollam-Alappuzha National Highway and when she reached near M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020 4 2025:KER:57434 Panmana Temple junction, car bearing registration no.KL-40-E- 5050 driven by the first respondent in a rash and negligent manner knocked her down, as a result of which she sustained grievous injuries to which she succumbed.
3. The first respondent-driver and the second respondent-owner of the offending car remained ex-parte.
4. The third respondent-insurer filed written statement admitting the policy, but denying negligence on the part of the first respondent. The averments in the petition regarding age, occupation and income of the deceased were disputed. The amount claimed was contended to be exorbitant.
5. Before the Tribunal, no oral evidence was adduced by either side. Exts.A1 to A13 were marked on the side of the claim petitioners. No documentary evidence was adduced by the respondents.
6. The Tribunal on consideration of the documentary evidence and after hearing both sides, found negligence on the part of the first respondent-driver of the M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020 5 2025:KER:57434 offending vehicle resulting in the incident and hence awarded an amount of ₹20,90,912/- together with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of the petition till realisation along with proportionate cost. Aggrieved by the Award, the third respondent/insurer has come up in appeal.
7. The only point that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether there is any infirmity in the findings of the Tribunal calling for an interference by this Court.
8. Heard the learned counsel for the third respondent-insurer.
9. The award of compensation by the Tribunal under the following heads is challenged by the third respondent/insurer-
Notional income It is submitted by the learned counsel for the third respondent-insurer that the monthly income of the deceased fixed by the Tribunal as ₹20,000/- per month, is on the higher side and hence the same needs to be reduced. It is also submitted that in the M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020 6 2025:KER:57434 light of the dictum in Ramachandrappa v. Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd, (2011) 13 SCC 236, the notional income can be fixed as ₹10,500/- per month.
9.1. Though the claim petitioners have raised a contention that the deceased was earning ₹20,000/- per month, no materials or evidence was produced to substantiate the same. The deceased was a housewife at the time of the accident and therefore, I find that fixing the notional at ₹12,000/- per month would be just and reasonable.
10. The impugned Award is modified to the following extent:
Sl. Head of claim Amount Amount Modified in No. claimed Awarded by appeal Tribunal (in ₹) (in ₹) (in ₹)
1. Transport to 10,000/- 10,000/- 10,000/-
hospital and (No modification) ambulance charge
2. Damage to 5,000/- 5,000/- 5,000/-
clothing and (No modification) articles
3. Funeral 30,000/- 15,000/- 15,000/-
expenses (No modification)
4. Postmortem 5,000/- Nil Nil
expenses (No modification)
M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020
7
2025:KER:57434
5. Compensation 50,000/- 30,000/- 30,000/-
for pain and (No modification)
sufferings
sustained by the
deceased
6. Compensation 1,00,000/- Nil Nil
for loss of love (No modification)
and affection
7. Compensation 3,00,000/- Nil Nil
for loss of love (No modification)
and affection
Compensation 1,00,000/-
for loss of
consortium -
parental 40,000/-
consortium to 1,00,000/- 40,000/- (No modification)
claimant no.2-
spousal 40,000/-
consortium to 40,000/- (No modification)
claimant no.1
compensation for
loss of support- 50,000/-
compensation for
loss of estate-
15,000/- 15,000/-
compensation for (No modification)
loss of amenities
and enjoyment in
life 11,61,600/-
compensation for 22,50,000/- 19,35,912/- 12,000/- +
loss of (12,000 x 10%)
dependency x 12 x 11 x 2/3)
Total 27,00,000/- 20,90,912/- 13,16,600/-
In the result, the appeal is allowed by deducting the M.A.C.A.No.323 of 2020 8 2025:KER:57434 compensation by an amount of ₹7,74,312/- (total compensation = ₹13,16,600/- that is, ₹20,90,912/- granted by the Tribunal minus ₹7,74,312/- deducted in appeal).
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Sd/-
C.S.SUDHA JUDGE Jms