M.T Satheesh vs The District Collector

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13370 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

M.T Satheesh vs The District Collector on 23 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
         THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946
                            WP(C) NO. 27776 OF 2016


PETITIONER:

              M.T SATHEESH
              AGED 43 YEARS, S/O. THANKAPPAN, MANJAKKIL,
              VENGOLA P.O., ARAKKAPADY VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK,
              ERNAKULAM DISTRICT (OWNER OF A LORRY BEARING
              REGISTRATION NO.KL-17-4171).

              BY ADV SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ



RESPONDENTS:

     1        THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
              ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 030.

     2        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
              CHERANELLOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 556.

     3        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
              ARAKKAPADY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 556.

     4        THE THAHASILDAR
              KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 556.

     5        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
              PATTIMATTOM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 556.




     BY ADV.

          SRI. B.S. SYAMANTAK, GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 27776 OF 2016


                                 2


              P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
          --------------------------------------------
              W.P.(C) No.27776 of 2016
         ----------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024



                       JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the prayers in this writ petition have become infructuous.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-


                                     P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
nvj                                         JUDGE