A.Arunachalam vs Shri. M.V. Vinod

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 13206 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

A.Arunachalam vs Shri. M.V. Vinod on 23 May, 2024

Author: Murali Purushothaman

Bench: Murali Purushothaman

Con.Case(C) No.509/2024                        1/3

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                             PRESENT
                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
                 Thursday, the 23rd day of May 2024 / 2nd Jyaishta, 1946
                 CONTEMPT CASE(C) NO. 509 OF 2024(S) IN WP(C) 35844/2023

   PETITIONER/PETITIONER:


           A.ARUNACHALAM, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.ANNAMALAI CHETTIAR,
           SARAN ILLAM, ANANDHAN STREET, NALLEPILLY.P.O, CHITTUR,
           PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 553.

        BY ADVS. M/S. M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI & BRIJESH MOHAN

   RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:


           SHRI. M.V. VINOD, GEOLOGIST, MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT,
           DISTRICT OFFICE, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, T.D.ROAD,
           PALAKKAD, PIN - 678 014.

            BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER


        This Contempt of court case (civil) having come up for orders on
   23.05.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:

                                                                P.T.O.
 Con.Case(C) No.509/2024                      2/3




                             MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
                           ---------------------------------------------
                               Con.Case (C) No.509 of 2024
                          ----------------------------------------------
                          Dated this the 23rd day of May, 2024


                                          O R D E R

The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the direction in Annexure D judgment has been complied with.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to verify the same.

Post on 30.05.2024.

Sd/-

MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SRJ 23-05-2024 /True Copy/ Deputy Registrar Con.Case(C) No.509/2024 3/3 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 509/2024 Annexure D CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31-10-2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.35844/2023.

23-05-2024 /True Copy/ Deputy Registrar