G.Kanakaraj vs The District Collector

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12788 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

G.Kanakaraj vs The District Collector on 21 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
   TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                      WP(C) NO. 38471 OF 2017


PETITIONER:

            G.KANAKARAJ
            AGED 57 YEARS
            S/O PAPPA, AGED 57 YEARS, 12 MURI LANE,
            MOOLAKKADA BHAGOM, KDH VILLAGE,
            MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
            BY ADV SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN

RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
            COLLECTORATE , PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685603.
    2       THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
            DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN.685612.
    3       THE TAHSILDAR
            TALUK OFFICE, DEVIKULAM,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN.685612.
    4       THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR AS THE VILLAGE OFFICER
            K.D.H VILLAGE, MUNNAR, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
            PIN.685612.
    5       THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
            MUNNAR POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT,
            PIN.685612.
            SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP



     THIS     WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION     ON   21.05.2024,    THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).No.38471/2017

                                   2




                   P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                    --------------------------------
                  W.P.(C).No.38471 of 2017
             ---------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024


                           JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

                                             P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JV                                                  JUDGE