Ummer vs The District Geologist

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12787 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

Ummer vs The District Geologist on 21 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
   TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                      WP(C) NO. 12271 OF 2017
PETITIONER:

         UMMER
         S/O.KUNHI MOHAMMED HAJI, AGED 46 YEARS, VALAPPIL
         HOUSE, OORAGAM KEEZHMURI P O, MALAPPURAM 676515,
         REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
         MR.IBRAHIM.M, S/O.ISMAIL MASTER, AGED 59 YEARS,
         MUSLIYARAKATH HOUSE, MANJERI P O, MALAPPURAM 679322.
         BY ADV SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ


RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
          DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
          MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-673639.
    2     THE DIRECTOR
          MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND
          GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
    3     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENTM
          INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
          SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY - GP



THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)No.12271/2017
                             ..2..


                P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE
            =========================
                 W.P(C) No.12271 of 2017
           ==========================
            Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024

                        JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.

Recording the afore submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE ACR