N.D.Joseph vs The District Geologist

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12782 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

N.D.Joseph vs The District Geologist on 21 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
        TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 29358 OF 2016
PETITIONER:

            N.D.JOSEPH
            AGED 51 YEARS
            S/O.DANIAL, AGED 51 YEARS,NELLIMATTATHIL HOUSE,
            THIRUVANKULAM.P.O.,THIRUVANKULAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR
            TALUK,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

            BY ADV SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ



RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
            DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682
            030.

    2       THAHASILDAR
            MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

    3       THE DIRECTOR
            MINING AND GEOLOGY,OFFICE OF THE MINING AND
            GEOLOGY,KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695
            001.

    4       THE STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,INDUSTRIES
            DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,GOVERNMENT
            SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 001.

            SRI.B.S.SYAMANTAK, GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P (C) No.29358 of 2016


                                2

                 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN,J.
              ---------------------
                 W.P (C) No.29358 of 2016
           ---------------------------
             Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024

                           JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition is infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE bng