Nithin vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12718 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

Nithin vs State Of Kerala on 21 May, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
   TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                          CRL.MC NO. 3045 OF 2024
   CRIME NO.752/2019 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE
   AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.180 OF 2020 OF
              JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS,NADAPURAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 :

       1       NITHIN, AGED 29 YEARS
               S/O BABU, KUNDILOTTUMMAL (H),
               VELLOOR, KODANCHERY P.O,
               KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673 580.
       2       SONU, AGED 26 YEARS
               S/O PRAMOD, KANNOTHUVAYAL (H),
               VELLOOR, KODANCHERY P.O,
               KOZHIKODE DISTRICT., PIN - 673 580.
       3       AKSHAYLAL, AGED 30 YEARS
               S/O MURALI, VELLARVALLI (H), VELLOOR,
               KODANCHERY P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 580.
               BY ADVS.B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL
               R.N.SANDEEP
               KEERTHI VIJAYAN
               JYOTHI R. NAIR


RESPONDENT/STATE :

       1       STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
               HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
       2       NITHINRAJ, AGED 30 YEARS,
               S/O RAJAN, CHAITHRAM (H),
               KACHERI, IRINGANNOOR P.O,
               VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673 505.
               BY ADV RANGEETH G.S.-R2
               SRI.RENJITH T.R. -R1


THIS       CRIMINAL   MISC.   CASE   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC 3045/2024

                                                  2




                              BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                         ......................................................
                                  Crl.M.C.No.3045 of 2024
                          ...................................................
                         Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024


                                              ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.180/2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram, arising out of Crime No.752/2019 of Nadapuram Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, and 324 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The second respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, on 26.11.2019 the accused had attacked the de facto complainant by throwing chilly powder into his face and body and assaulted him, and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public CRL.MC 3045/2024 3 Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-A2 affidavit filed by the second respondent. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the de facto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is CRL.MC 3045/2024 4 involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.180/2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram, arising out of Crime No.752/2019 of Nadapuram Police Station, are quashed. This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/25/05/2024 CRL.MC 3045/2024 5 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3045/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 752/2019 OF NADAPURAM POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT PENDING BEFORE HON'BLE JUDICIAL FIRST-CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, NADAPURAM AS CC 180/2020.

ANNEXURE A2 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2.

TRUE COPY