Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Kerala High Court
O. Prasanthan vs The District Collector on 21 May, 2024
Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 24290 OF 2017
PETITIONERS:
1 O. PRASANTHAN
AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN NAIR,RESIDING AT
AMBADI, CHELLANNUR P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
2 PAVITHRAN CHERUVOTTULLIYIL
AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.KANARAN,RESIDING AT CHERUVOTTILY
KAKKUR P.O, NANMINDA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICTRERPESENTED
BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER O.PRASANTHAN,AGED 43
YEARS, S/O. BHASKARAN NAIR,RESIDING AT AMBADI,
CHELLANNUR P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.KRISHNANUNNI (SR.)
SRI.P.ABDUL RAZAK
SRI.R.NIKHIL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
KOZHIKODE,CIVIL STATION,ERANHIPALAM,
KOZHIKODE 600 001
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
KOZHIKODE,CIVIL STATION, ERANHIPALAM,
KOZHIKODE 600 001
3 THE TAHZILDAR
KOZHIKODE, CIVIL STATION,ERANHIPALAM,
KOZHIKODE 600 001
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
CHELLANNUR, OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER
CHELANNUR, KOZHIKODE 673 716
5 HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGERHPCL KOZHIKODE RETAIL
REGIONAL OFFICE,ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE 673 023
6 SRI PRAMOD
CHATHANATTU THAZHAM HOUSE,KAKKUR P.O, NANMINDA,
KOZHIKODE 673 613
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
WP(C)No.24290/2017
..2..
SRI.K.M.FIROZ
SRI.P.GOPINATH
SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI
SRI.JOSON MANAVALAN
SRI.KURYAN THOMAS
SRI.PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
SMT.M.SHAJNA
SRI.B.S.SYAMANTAK, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No.24290/2017
..3..
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE
=========================
W.P(C) No.24290 of 2017
==========================
Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.
Recording the afore submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE ACR