Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Kerala High Court
Anusree S vs The Deputy Director Of Education on 21 May, 2024
WP(C) No.11519/2024 1/4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Tuesday, the 21st day of May 2024 / 31st Vaisakha, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11519 OF 2024(L)
PETITIONER:
ANUSREE S, AGED 29 YEARS, W/O. DEEKSHITH, HST(MATHS), PALORA HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL, ULLIYERI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673323
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673001
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL
OFFICER, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673573
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provisionally approve the
appointment of the petitioner as HST(Mathematics) in Palora Higher
Secondary School with effect from 21.10.2021 with all consequential
benefits, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN, ATHIRA A.MENON, AJMAL AHMED R., HARISANKAR.K.V.
Advocates for the petitioner the court passed the following:
WP(C) No.11519/2024 2/4
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J.
---------------------
W.P.C No. 11519 of 2024
---------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024
ORDER
The learned Government Pleader seeks further time to file counter affidavit.
2. It is the specific case advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, the main reason on which the approval of appointment of the petitioner denied was that, the appointment was made by the Manager, whose appointment is under challenge before this Court. Yet another reason was that the petitioner was not having K.TET qualification as on the date of occurrence of vacancy.
3. However, it is discernible from Ext.P4 that she obtained the said qualification on 20.10.2021. In such circumstances, I am of the view that, an interim order can be passed in this case, directing the 2nd respondent to provisionally approve the appointment of the petitioner, in the scale of pay, with effect from the date on which she acquired the qualification, namely 20.10.2021. While passing this order I have taken note of the observation made by the Division Bench in Ext.P6 judgment, with reference to the objection as to the failure of the management to WP(C) No.11519/2024 3/4 W.P.C No. 13225 of 2024 2 fill up the vacancies of physically handicapped persons. Orders shall be passed in this regard within a period of one month from today.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE rpk 21-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar WP(C) No.11519/2024 4/4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11519/2024 Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE K.TET - III CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.12.2021 Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA NO. 1445/2022 DATED 13.03.2023 21-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar