Nabiyul Ajmal vs The District Collector, District ...

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12563 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

Nabiyul Ajmal vs The District Collector, District ... on 21 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
        TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946
                          WP(C) NO. 35355 OF 2017
PETITIONER:

            NABIYUL AJMAL
            AGED 38 YEARS
            S/O.ABOOBACKER,AGED 38 YEARS,NEERULPPAN HOUSE,EDAVANNA
            P O,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN 676541.

            BY ADV SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS



RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE,
            MALAPPURAM
            PIN 676505.

    2       THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEEDATA BANK
            REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR,AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
            KRISHI BHAVAN, COMPANYPARAMBU ROAD,EDAVANNA, MALAPPURAM
            676541.

    3       THE VILLAGE OFFICER
            VILLAGE OFFICE, EDAVANNA,MALAPPURAM 676541.




OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP




     THIS     WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON
21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                         P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
                     = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                        W.P.(c).No.35355 of 2017
                    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                   Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024

                                JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no instruction from his party. If that is the case, this writ petition need not be retained further. The writ petition is, therefore, closed.

Sd/-

P.V.Kunhikrishnan, Judge sj22/5/24 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35355/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE DATA BANK EXHIBIT P2 A COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO 46848/P1/2016/REVENUE DTD 22/12/2016 EXHIBIT P3 A COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO TA(2)18988/16 DTD 26/7/2017 EXHIBIT P4 A COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 22/9/2017 IN WPC NO 29694/2017 EXHIBIT P6 A COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO B2-57995/2014 DTD 22/9/2017 OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR EXHIBIT P7 A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 5/8/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P8 A COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.