The St. John’S Church vs The Tahsildar (Lr)

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12501 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

The St. John’S Church vs The Tahsildar (Lr) on 21 May, 2024

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT

                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

               TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2024 / 31ST VAISAKHA, 1946

                               WP(C) NO. 9937 OF 2024

PETITIONERS:

     1         THE ST. JOHN'S CHURCH
               KONTHURUTHY,THEVARA, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE,
               KANAYANNUR TALUK, COCHIN , REP. BY ITS
               PIN - 682013

     2         A) VICAR, REV. FR. PAUL CHITTINAPALLY
               S/O. VARGHESE, THE ST. JOHN'S CHURCH,
               KONTHURUTHY, THEVARA, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE,
               KANAYANNUR TALUK, COCHIN., PIN - 682013

     3         B) TRUSTEE, JOHN MATHEW KALATHIVEETTIL
               S/O. MATHEW THOMAS, CASA JOHNS, 58/113,
               K.T.MATHEW MASTER ROAD, KONTHURUTHY,
               COCHIN., PIN - 682013

     4         C) TRUSTEE THOMAS P. KANATT
               S/O. K.T.PAPPY,KANATT HOUSE,
               KONTHURUTHY, COCHIN., PIN - 682013

     5         2. THE ST. JOSEPH CHURCH KADAVANTHRA
               K.P.VALLON ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI,
               REP. BY ITS:, PIN - 682020

     6         A) VICAR, FR. BENNICHAN JOHN MARAMPARAMBIL
               S/O. OUSEPH JOHN, ST. JOSEPH CHURCH,
               KADAVANTHRA, K.P.VALLON ROAD,
               KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI., PIN - 682020

     7         B) TRUSTEE, FR. JOHN K.T
               S/O. THOMAS, KATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,
               ST. JOSEPH CHURCH ROAD, KADAVANTHRA,
               COCHIN., PIN - 682020

     8         C) TRUSTEE. LONAPPAN K.D
               S/O. DEVASSY, KONOPARAMBAN HOUSE,
               VIDYA NAGAR, K.P.VALLON ROAD, KADAVANTHRA,
               COCHIN., PIN - 682020

               BY ADVS.
               DINESH R.SHENOY
               SILESH S. PRABHU
               JOMOL PIUS
 WP(C) No.9937 of 2024                      2



RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE TAHSILDAR (LR)
             KANAYANNUR, TALUK OFFICE, KANAYANNUR TALUK,
             COCHIN ., PIN - 682011

     2       THE VILLAGE OFFICER.
             ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, ELAMKULAM,
             COCHIN., PIN - 682020

             BY ADVS.
             ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
             SHRI.K.P.JAYACHANDRAN, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL()



OTHER PRESENT:

             GP - DEEPA V




      THIS     WRIT   PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD   ON

21.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.9937 of 2024                                    3




                                    VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
                    .................................................................
                                W.P.(C) No.9937 of 2024
                    .................................................................
                        Dated this the 21st day of May, 2024


                                          JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to receive tax in respect of the properties comprised in survey nos.845/2,3, 847/6 and 850/1,2 of Elamkulam Village, which are covered by Exts.P1 to P3, which are in the absolute ownership and possession of the petitioners and to grant consequential ROR certificate, tax receipt and possession and location certificate within a time limit to be fixed by this Court.

2. It is averred that the 1st petitioner is a very ancient church which was set up centuries ago and was allotted vast lands by the then Rulers of Cochin as 'Puravaka and Pandaravaka Verumpattom' as per Patta no.130, copy of which is produced as Ext.P1. The land is shown as land outstanding in the ownership and possession of the 1 st petitioner church even as per Ext.P2 settlement register which dates back to the beginning of the 20th century. Petitioners submit that in Ext.P2 the patta number has been recorded. Based on the patta the property was mutated in the name of the 1st petitioner church and the 1st petitioner was enjoying and paying WP(C) No.9937 of 2024 4 land tax in respect of the said property even before independence of India and thereafter, after the formation of the State of Kerala in thandaper no.130 as is evident from Ext.P3 BTR. Petitioners submit that the 5 th petitioner (wrongly shown as 2nd petitioner in the writ petition) is a subsidiary church formed under the 1st petitioner and properties comprised in survey nos.845/2 (23 cents), 845/3 (5 cents), 847/6 (9 cents), 850/1 (53 cents) and 850/2 (4 cents) which are originally under the ownership and possession of the 1st petitioner church have been transferred to the possession of the 5th petitioner and thereafter 5th petitioner is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the said properties from 1972 onwards. In the said properties schools are situated which have been started by the 5 th petitioner and the tax in respect of the said buildings were remitted by the 5 th petitioner as is evident from Ext.P4. The 5th petitioner submitted Ext.P6 application before the 1st respondent producing copies of the abovesaid records and requesting that a certificate may be issued together with ROR and tax receipt in respect of the abovesaid lands as expeditiously as possible so as to enable the registration of a settlement deed by the 1 st petitioner in favour of the 5th petitioner. The 5th petitioner has also produced Ext.P7 encumbrance certificate before the respondents to show that nobody else is claiming any right over the said lands as per the records of the Sub Registry. Petitioners submit that Ext.P1 patta has been misplaced decades ago and could not be traced out. Though the petitioners have made every WP(C) No.9937 of 2024 5 effort to obtain a certified or duplicate copy of the same from all authorities, including the archives, office of the Tahsildar and other land revenue offices they are not able to obtain certified copy of the same. It is in the said circumstances that the petitioners have approached this Court. Petitioners further submit that Ext.P6 application is pending consideration before the 1 st respondent and that the matter has been posted to 12.06.2024 for further consideration. Petitioners would further submit that a perusal of Ext.P1 would reveal that the same has been produced before the Special Tahsildar(LR), Cochin Corporation which would reveal the veracity of the same.

3. Learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the application is pending consideration and it is for the petitioners to produce all the documents in support of their contentions.

The only lacuna is non-availability of original of Ext.P1 patta. It is the contention of the petitioners that it has been lost irrecoverably and in spite of sincere efforts a copy of the same could not be secured for the reason that the same is not available with the revenue authorities. Petitioners submit that in Ext.P2 settlement register there is a reference to Ext.P1 patta and that tax was paid in respect of the said properties as is evident from Ext.P3. It is seen that patta is prior to independence. Even though only a copy of Ext.P1 is produced, reference of the same could be seen in Ext.P2 and that tax was paid as per Ext.P3. Further a perusal of Ext.P1 would WP(C) No.9937 of 2024 6 reveal that the original of the patta was produced before the Special Tahsildar (LR) Cochin corporation also. Therefore, the authorities should verify the issuance of Ext.P1 patta in favour of the petitioners and its veracity as the petitioners in spite their sincere efforts could not get a certified copy of Ext.P1 patta. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as follows:

The 1st respondent shall conduct an enquiry into the issuance of Ext.P1 patta to his satisfaction. Thereafter the 1 st respondent shall take a decision on Ext.P6 application taking into consideration Exts.P2 and P3 documents.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE cks WP(C) No.9937 of 2024 7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9937/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF PATTA NO.130 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE FIRST PETITIONER.
Exhibit P2                TRUE TYPED COPY OF EXTRACT        OF   THE
                          SETTLEMENT REGISTER RELATING      TO   THE
                          RELEVANT SURVEY NUMBER.

Exhibit P3                TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THANDAPER ACCOUNT
                          NO.130, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE, STANDING IN
                          THE NAME OF THE FIRST PETITIONER CHURCH.

Exhibit P4                TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT
                          NO.022315 DATED 9/4/2002, CORPORATION OF
                          COCHIN.

Exhibit P5                TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT
                          NO.KL07022322053/2023 DATED 8/11/2023.

Exhibit P6                TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF APPLICATION DATED
                          3/1/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER
                          BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P7                TRUE     PHOTOCOPY      OF     ENCUMBRANCE
                          CERTIFICATE    ID    NO.P29195193    DATED
                          14/2/2024.