Beerankutty vs Pran Sing K.G

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12365 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2024

Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.

Kerala High Court

Beerankutty vs Pran Sing K.G on 20 May, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
      MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1946
                        CON.CASE(C) NO. 1049 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.5238 OF 2024 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

             BEERANKUTTY
             AGED 60 YEARS
             S/O CHEERANGAN KUNHALAVI CHEERANGAN HOUSE IRINGALLUR
             AMSOM DESOM TIRURANGADI TALUK MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN
             - 676304

             BY ADVS.
             JAMSHEED HAFIZ
             T.S.SREEKUTTY



RESPONDENT/3rd RESPONDENT:

             PRAN SING K.G
             (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE
             TAHASILDAR, TIRURANGADI, TALUK OFFICE, TIRURANGADI,
             MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-, PIN - 676306


OTHER PRESENT:

             SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GP




     THIS    CONTEMPT    OF   COURT    CASE     (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 20.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Contempt of Court Case (C) No.1049/2024

                               2

                 P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
             ---------------------
        Contempt of Court Case (C) No.1049 of 2024
        ---------------------------
            Dated this the 20th day of May, 2024

                         JUDGMENT

This Contempt of Court Case is filed stating that there is violation of the directions in the judgment dated 09.02.2024 in W.P.(c) No.5238/2024.

The learned Government Pleader submitted that an order is passed consequent to the judgment as evident by Annexure A2. If the petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure A2, the petitioner can challenge the same separately. There is no contempt in this case. Hence, this Contempt of Court Case is closed.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE bng Contempt of Court Case (C) No.1049/2024 3 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1049/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 02.04.2024 ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 04.04.2024