Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Kerala High Court
Mascom Steel (India) Pvt. Ltd vs The Assistant Engineer on 20 May, 2024
Author: N.Nagaresh
Bench: N.Nagaresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 29139 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
MASCOM STEEL (INDIA) PVT. LTD,
ERUMATHALA P.O., V-713, NEAR IDA, ALUVA,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI.GEORGE
ANTONY, PIN - 683112
BY ADVS.
N.JAMES KOSHY
ALEX ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
EDATHALA SECTION, ALUVA,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683563
2 THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 683542
3 THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE)
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM PLACE P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
4 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM PLACE P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING
DIRECTOR,
PIN - 695004
5 THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR,
HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
W.P.(C) No.29139/2023
:2:
6 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.,
ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, KIZHAKKAMBALAM,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683562
SRI.B.PRAMOD(STANDING COUNSEL)FOR R1 TO R4 & R6
SRI.S.GOPINATHAN, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 20.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.29139/2023
:3:
N. NAGARESH, J.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No.29139 of 2023
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 20th day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
~~~~~~~~~ The petitioner, a Private Limited Company engaged in the manufacture of steel bars, is before this Court aggrieved by Ext.P36 proceedings of the Assessing Officer under the Electrical Sub Division, Kizhakkambalam. By Ext.P36, a final assessment order was made against the petitioner for an amount of ₹4,17,41,199/-.
2. The petitioner was granted power connection of 1000 KVA HT up to the year 2017. In the year 2017, the petitioner noted that a minimum load of 2500 KVA was necessary for the working of the factory. The petitioner submitted a request dated 15.02.2017 to increase contract demand to 2500 KVA immediately. Thereupon, Ext.P3 W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 :4: feasibility report was drawn. The 2nd respondent accorded administrative sanction to an estimate amount of ₹51,43,730/- for executing the work of enhancing the connected load. As demanded, the petitioner remitted ₹20,82,500/-. After necessary work, the 5 th respondent granted sanction for energisation for installation in the factory.
3. On 17.09.2018, the petitioner submitted a formal application for service connection with enhanced contract demand of 3120.5 HP. The service connection required NOC from the Panchayat. The Panchayat denied grant of NOC for enhancing the connected electricity load. The petitioner filed appeal No.553/2016 in the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Panchayat and directed the Secretary to reconsider application for NOC afresh.
4. On 15.01.2019, the Additional District Magistrate gave sanction to draw the line to enhance the power supply to the petitioner. The unit was thereafter energised with a W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 :5: contract demand of 3120.5 HP.
5. To the surprise of the petitioner, they were served with Exts.P20 to P31 demand notices and collected energy charges from the petitioner one and a half time the demand charges. The amounts totalled to ₹77,51,250/-. Thereafter, a team of KSEB officers inspected the Company on 15.07.2023 and prepared Ext.P33 mahazar. In Ext.P33, it was alleged that the connected load in the unit is 3570200 Watts. On the basis of Ext.P33, Ext.P34 provisional bill for ₹4,18,21,242/- was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted Ext.P35 objection to the provisional assessment. The 6th respondent, however, passed Ext.P36 final order confirming the liability of ₹4,17,41,199/-. The petitioner was required to pay the amount within 30 days.
6. The petitioner states that Ext.P36 final order is arbitrary and illegal. Ext.P34 provisional bill was issued without stating any reason for the assessment. The petitioner had applied for enhancement of contract demand. No decision on the application for enhancement of loan was W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 :6: given to the petitioner. As per Regulation 99(8), sanction should be deemed to have been granted with effect from 31 st day of the date of submission of application by consumer.
7. The petitioner urged that the respondents have not issued any notice to the petitioner as contemplated under Regulation 101 until Ext.P36 was passed. Ext.P36 violates the provisions of the Electricity Supply Code, 2014. The petitioner also pointed out various illegalities/irregularities in the matter of assessment and urged that Ext.P36 final order be quashed and respondents be directed to refund the excess amount collected from the petitioner.
8. Standing Counsel entered appearance on behalf of the respondents and resisted the writ petition. On behalf of the respondents, it is submitted that the agreed contract demand and connected load of the petitioner was 1000 KVA and 792.15 KW respectively. An inspection conducted revealed that the consumer is having a total connected load of 3570.200 KW. Sanction was given for constructing 2200 metres HP ABC from 110 KV Edathala SS to the petitioner's W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 :7: premises for an extent of 1500 KVA in addition to existing 1000 KVA. The work was completed and energised on 09.04.2019.
9. The respondents submitted that the petitioner was issued notice dated 08.08.2009 for regularising the connected load. The petitioner failed to submit application for load regularisation. The petitioner was aware of the existence of unauthorised connected load. The writ petition is devoid of any merit, contented the respondents.
10. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel representing respondents 1 to 4 and 6 and the learned Government Pleader representing the 5th respondent.
11. It is an admitted position that the consumer has signed a High Tension agreement with the licensee on 02.12.2009 for the use of electricity under industrial tariff for a connected load of 792.15 KW and contract demand of 1000 KVA. The Anti Power Theft Squad conducted an inspection of the premises of the petitioner on 15.07.2023. W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 :8: The inspection revealed unauthorised additional load of 2778 KW against the sanctioned load of 792 KW. The total load connected to the supply system at the time of inspection was 3570 KW. It was in the said circumstances that the provisional assessment order for ₹4,18,21,242/- was issued on 25.07.2023.
12. If the connected load / contract demand exceeds, the unauthorised connected load will attract Section 126(6)
(b)(ii) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
13. The argument of the petitioner and objection raised by the petitioner in Ext.P35 is that the petitioner had submitted application for enhancement of connected load. If an application is submitted for service connection and orders are not passed within the specified time, the consumer is free to use the applied quantity of electricity on payment of electricity charges without penalty. Therefore, the penalty of 1.5 times is illegal as the petitioner has consumed less than the connected load applied for.
W.P.(C) No.29139/2023:9:
14. The respondents would urge that no evidence was submitted by the petitioner during the hearing held on 08.08.2023 for the remittance of the application fee for load regularisation in the industrial unit. The power allocation application was submitted only on 05.01.2018. The power allocation sanctioned was issued only on 12.04.2018.
15. The question therefore arises whether the petitioner-Company had submitted application for enhancement of contract demand. The issues therefore involve disputed questions of fact. The Electricity Act provides for appeal against assessment of penalty. The petitioner has alternate remedy to file appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
16. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be only appropriate that the petitioner files statutory appeal against the impugned orders. The statute prescribes a limitation of 30 days for entertaining an appeal. The statute also prescribes for pre-deposit. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has been bona fide agitating his case W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 : 10 : before this Court filing the writ petition and taking into account the stakes involved in the matter, I am of the view that if the petitioner prefers an appeal making the statutory pre-deposit, then the appellate authority shall consider the appeal on merits and pass orders.
The writ petition is therefore disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a statutory appeal against Ext.P36 order making requisite pre-deposit, within a period of two weeks. If the petitioner files the appeal satisfying all other statutory requirements within a period of two weeks, then the appellate authority shall consider the appeal on merits and pass final orders within a further period of two months. If appeal is filed by the petitioner making deposit as directed above, coercive proceedings, if any, proposed against the petitioner shall stand deferred till the appellate authority takes final decision.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH, JUDGE aks/14.05.2024 W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 : 11 : APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29139/2023 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.MISPL/MISC/0001 DATED 05.08.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.02.2017 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR ENHANCING THE CONTRACT DEMAND Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FEASIBILITY REPORT DATED 15.01.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER 66 KV SUB STATION, EDATHALA Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.ECP/T2/ HT/MASCOM STEEL/2018-19/90/12.4.18 DATED 07.04.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION ORDER NO.1/ECP/ 2018- 19/PBVR/T2/HT-MASCOM STEEL/88 DATED 12.04.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT WITH ESTIMATE OF THE WORK SANCTIONED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.04.2018 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.476477 DATED 13.04.2018 FOR REMITTING RS.20,82,500/- ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID REQUEST MADE BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR APPROVAL TO ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR, VYTTILA Exhibit-P9 TRUE COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER NO.B3- 20444/2017/CEI DATED 22.05.2018 ALONG WITH DETAILS OF THE CONNECTED LOAD SANCTIONED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 : 12 : Exhibit-P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT AS PER LETTER NO.DB/EDATHALA/2018- 19/21 DATED 23.05.2018 Exhibit-P11 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SERVICE CONNECTION DATED 17.09.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P12 TRUE COPY OF THE SIGNED DEED OF AGREEMENT SIGNED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit-P13 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.ECP/T2/GENERAL/2018-19/2315/ 8.11.18 DATED 01.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit-P14 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN APPEAL NO.553/2016 DATED 29.11.2018 OF THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Exhibit-P15 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 162278 DATED 24.11.2018 ISSUED BY THE KSEB LTD. FOR REMITTANCE OF RS.1,78,800/- Exhibit-P16 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.DB2/18- 19/EDLA/63 DATED 01.12.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, EDATHALA POLICE STATION Exhibit-P17 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO.DB/10/KBLM/CASES/18-19/174 DATED 07.12.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAKKANAD Exhibit-P18 TRUE COPY OF THE SANCTION ORDER NO.DCEKM-11391/2018/MS DATED 15.01.2019 OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KAKKANAD Exhibit-P19 TRUE COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 03.04.2019 BY REMITTING RS.1270/- OF THE KSEB ENERGISATION APPROVAL ISSUED BY THE SUB TREASURY, TRIPUNITHURA Exhibit-P20 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 03.08.2022 W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 : 13 : Exhibit-P21 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 02.09.2022 Exhibit-P22 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 06.10.2022 Exhibit-P23 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 03.11.2022 Exhibit-P24 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 02.12.2022 Exhibit-P25 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 04.01.2023 Exhibit-P26 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 02.02.2023 Exhibit-P27 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 02.03.2023 Exhibit-P28 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 04.04.2023 Exhibit-P29 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 03.05.2023 Exhibit-P30 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 02.06.2023 Exhibit-P31 TRUE COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES FOR AUGUST, 2022 TO DECEMBER, 2022 AND FOR JANUARY, 2023 TO JULY, 2023 AS PER BILL DATED 06.07.2023 W.P.(C) No.29139/2023 : 14 : Exhibit-P32 TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMARY OF BILLS SHOWING THE PENALTY COLLECTED FROM THE PETITIONER WITHOUT ANY VALID REASON AMOUNTING TO RS.77,51,250/-
Exhibit-P33 TRUE COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 15.07.2023 PREPARED BY A TEAM OF KSEB OFFICERS OF THE PETITIONER'S COMPANY Exhibit-P34 TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ORDER NO.DB/36/2023-24/KBLM/PROVISIONAL BILL/ORDER DATED 25.07.2023 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit-P35 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 08.08.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P36 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER NO.DB/36/2023-24/KBLM/FINAL BILL/ ORDER NO.229 DATED 09.08.2023 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT Exhibit-P37 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.ECP/T4/CD EXCEEDING/2023-24/1304 DATED 22.08.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER