Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Kerala High Court
Usha vs The Revenue Divisional Officer on 14 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 24TH VAISAKHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 17647 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
USHA
AGED 58 YEARS
W/O MOHANDAS P.V,, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, VADACODE
KARA, VADACODE P.O, AND NOW RESIDING AT 'USHA
BHAVAN', PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, MAVELIPURAM,
KAKKANAD P.O, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 682030
BY ADVS.
G.G.MANOJ
S.SARATH PRASAD
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, K.B JACOB ROAD, FORT
KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 682001
2 TAHASILDAR (LR)
KANAYANNUR TALUK, KANAYANNUR TALUK OFFICE, NEAR
SUBHASH PARK, MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT., PIN - 682011
3 VILLAGE OFFICER
THRIKKAKKARA NORTH VILLAGE OFFICE EDAPPALLY
KOONAMTHAI KERALA, PIN - 682024
OTHER PRESENT:
GP - ADV.PARVATHY K
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). No.17647 of 2024 :2:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
W.P.(C) No.17647 of 2024
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Dated this the 14th day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 - Form 6 application, submitted by the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is the absolute owner and in possession of an extent of 03.50 Ares of land in Re-Survey No.868/5 in Re. Survey Block No.5 of Thrikkakkara North Village, Kanayannur Taluk. In the Basic Tax Register, the above property is described as 'Nilam'(paddy land). Thereupon the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 application in Form-6 before the 1st respondent, to change the nature of the property.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the above writ petition with a direction to the 1 st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/ W.P.(C). No.17647 of 2024 :3: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17647/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit -P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY DATED 22.06.2023 ISSUED BY ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit -P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FORM NO. 6 DATED 20.03.2024 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Exhibit -P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 20.03.2024 EVIDENCING THE REMITTANCE OF FEE FOR THE EXT-P2 APPLICATION