Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query (Query Alert Service). Try out our Premium Member Services -- Sign up today and get free trial for one month.
Kerala High Court
Muraleedharan K.V vs The Sub Collector, Kozhikode on 14 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 24TH VAISAKHA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 17618 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
MURALEEDHARAN K.V.
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O. DAMODARAN NAIR, MADAKKOTH HOUSE,VELLIPRAMBU
P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673008
BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SUB COLLECTOR, KOZHIKODE
KOZHIKODE COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION
P.O.,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673020
2 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
KRISHI BHAVAN, PERUVAYAL,PERUVAYAL P.O., KOZHIKODE
DISTRICT, PIN - 673008
3 THE TAHSILDAR, KOZHIKODE
KOZHIKODE TALUK OFFICE,ERANHIPPALAM, CIVIL STATION
P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673020
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
KUTTIKKATTOOR VILLAGE OFFICE,KUTTIKKATTOOR,
KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673008
5 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
KRISHI BHAVAN, PERUVAYAL, PERUVAYAL P.O.,KOZHIKODE
DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER,
PIN - 673008
OTHER PRESENT:
GP - ADV. PARVATHY K
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). No.17618 of 2024 :2:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
W.P.(C) No.17618 of 2024
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Dated this the 14th day of May, 2024
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 - Form 6 application, submitted by the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is the absolute owner and in possession of an extent of 3.24 Ares of land in Survey No.37/2 of Kuttikkattoor Village, Kozhikode Taluk. The above said property is a converted land and it is removed from the data bank on the application of the petitioner. Thereupon the petitioner has preferred Ext.P3 application in Form-6 before the 1st respondent, to change the nature of the property.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also. After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the above writ petition with a direction to the 1 st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/ W.P.(C). No.17618 of 2024 :3: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17618/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE KUTTIKKATTOOR VILLAGE OFFICE DATED 17.06.2022 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 11.10.2022 Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 22.11.2022