Siyad vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9975 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Siyad vs State Of Kerala on 5 April, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
          FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                         CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024
          CRIME NO.2341/2021 OF Medical College Police Station,
                            Thiruvananthapuram
      AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.110 OF 2024 OF
      ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM


PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS 1 TO 4:



      1       SIYAD,
              AGED 30 YEARS
              S/O. SAYED KHAN, S.A NIVAS, KAROMKODU, MEENADU VILLAGE,
              KOLLAM, PIN - 691572.

      2       SIBIN
              AGED 28 YEARS
              PUNNAVILA VEEDU THAZHUTHALLA VILLAGE UMAYANALLOOR
              KOLLAM, PIN - 691589.

      3       SAJEENA,
              AGED 48 YEARS
              W/O. SAYED KHAN, S.A NIVAS, KAROMKODU, MEENADU VILLAGE,
              KOLLAM, PIN - 691572.

      4       SAFEENA
              AGED 49 YEARS
              W/O SALAUDEEN PUNNAVILA VEEDU THAZHUTHALLA VILLAGE
              UMAYANALLOOR KOLLAM, PIN - 691589.

              BY ADV SNEHA JOY


RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

  1         STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
            COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031.

  2         THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695011.
      CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024
                                  2

 3             PRABHU
               AGED 32 YEARS
               S/O. SASI , TC NO. 54/716 (2), SMRA 310,
               SASI BHAVAN, KEEZHEMANGATTUKONAM
               MAKKOTTUKONAM, NEDUKADU WARD, MANACAUD,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695009.
 4             MAHESH
               AGED 38 YEARS
               S/O. CHANDRAN NAIR PALARA PUTHEN VEEDU, TC
               NO. 52/3481, NEAR PALARA VINAYAKA KALLAYANA
               MANDAPAM, PAPPANAMCODE, NEMOM,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695020.
 5             RAJESH KUMAR M
               AGED 39 YEARS
               S/O. JAYAMOHANAN PILLAI, KIZHAKAE POOVEN
               PILLAI VEEDU, KARUMANDAL STREET, NEAR
               POOTTINGHAL TEMPLE, PARAVUR, KOLLAM, PIN -
               691301.

               BY ADV Sarin
               SMT. SREEJA V. -PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


        THIS   CRIMINAL   MISC.   CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024
                                 3

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                -----------------------------------------
                  Crl.M.C. No. 2689 of 2024
                 ----------------------------------------
             Dated this the 5th day of April, 2024


                              ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in C.C. No. 110 of 2024 on the files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram, arising out of Crime No. 2341 of 2021 of Medical College Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Respondents 3 to 5 are the defacto complainant and the injured witnesses.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 11-11-2021 abused the defacto complainant and assaulted him and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024 4 the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure A3 to Annexure A5 affidavits filed by respondents 3 to 5. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are genuine, and the defacto complainant and the other deponents stand by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in C.C. No. 110 of 2024 on the files of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvananthapuram are quashed. CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024 5 This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM CRL.MC NO. 2689 OF 2024 6 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2689/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF F.I.R IN CRIME NO.

2341/2021 OF MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CC NO. 110/2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

Annexure A3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Annexure A4 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

Annexure A5 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.