Kerala High Court
Rahul vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Rr) on 12 April, 2024
Author: Murali Purushothaman
Bench: Murali Purushothaman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA,
1946
WP(C) NO. 5059 OF 2017
PETITIONER/S:
RAHUL
AGED 22 YEARS
S/O.RAJAN, MANJALODY HOUSE, THEKKE
VAVANNUR, VAKKAPADI, KAVASSER PO, ALATHUR
TALUK, PALAKKAD 678 531.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.R.GANGADAS
SRI.M.A.SHAJI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR)
TALUK OFFICE, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678
601.
2 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
KAVASSERY I VILLAGE, ALTHUR 678 543.
3 ADDL. R3 . THE ORIENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
LIMITTED,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE, IIIRD FLOOR, BUILTECH
FOUNDATION, CHITTOOR ROAD, PALAKKAD. 678
001. IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL. R3 AS PER ORDER
DATED 23.02.2017 IN IA NO. 2633/2017.
BY ADV SRI.TITUS MANI
BY G.P. SRI. JUSTIN JACOB.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC No.5059 /2017
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P1 demand notice. This Court, by order dated 23.2.2017, kept in abeyance the proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 for a period of one month. The said order is not seen extended further. It appears that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
In case the petitioner has any surviving grievance, the petitioner can approach this Court with appropriate application.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE al/-.12.04.2024.
WPC No.5059 /20173
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5059/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO. 2016/258/9/100 DATED 18.4.2016 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT