Kerala High Court
Santhosh Mathew vs K.John @Ashok on 12 April, 2024
Author: Murali Purushothaman
Bench: Murali Purushothaman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
RP NO. 1198 OF 2023
AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 11.10.2023 IN WP(C) NO.33354
REVIEW PETITIONER/THIRD PARTY:
SANTHOSH MATHEW, AGED 50 YEARS
ADVOCATE, S/O LATE RAJAN MATHEW, 17 AB,
MATHER SERENE ORCHARD, VIDYA NAGAR,
KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI., PIN - 682020
BY ADVS.
ARUN THOMAS
B.G.HARINDRANATH
KARTHIKA MARIA
KURIAN ANTONY MATHEW
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENT :
1 K.JOHN @ASHOK, AGED 68 YEARS
S/O LATE K.J. JOSEPH, MAMUTTIL ESTATE,
OOTTUPARA P.O., ARUVAPPULAM VILLAGE,
KONNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA,
NOW RESIDING AT AT 9-B2 CONDOR DAFFODILS,
KURAVANKONAM, KOWDIAR P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 689691
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT., PIN - 689645
BY ADV K.JOHN @ASHOK(Party-In-Person)
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLLY HEARD ON
12.02.2024, THE COURT ON ON 12.04.2024 DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :2:
ORDER
The review petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 11.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.33354 of 2023. The review petitioner was not a party to the writ petition. This Court, by order dated 13.11.2023, granted leave to file this review petition.
2. W.P.(C) No. 33354 of 2023 is filed by the 1 st respondent in the review petition (hereinafter referred to as the 'writ petitioner') who claims to own agricultural land in Aruvappullam Village of Konni Taluk, Pathanamthitta District, and permanently resides in Thiruvananthapuram, leading a retired life. In the writ petition, it is stated that the writ petitioner's property is located near the Achankovil R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :3: river and the banks of the said river are unassigned and maintained as river puramboke to ensure the free flow of water during the monsoon season or when excess water is released from the reservoirs of the Sabarigiri Electricity Project by the KSEB. It is contended that, taking advantage of the vast puramboke land along the river banks, certain persons encroached upon the puramboke land and started plantation activities and obtained illegal assignments of the property by influencing corrupt officials. Even a slight increase in water levels in the river is causing crop damage and flooding in the area, as the free flow of water in the river has been affected by the encroachment on the river puramboke. It is also contended that certain other properties vested in the Government have also been R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :4: converted by these persons as their property. The writ petitioner submitted Ext. P1 representation before the respondent, the District Collector, Pathanamthitta requesting to take action against the illegal occupation of the river puramboke, as well as the conversion of river puramboke into private properties and against the creation of forged deeds, including the Thandaper Account in the concerned village office. He also submitted Ext. P3 reminder to Ext. P1. However, no reply was received from the respondent, nor has any action been taken thereon. It is stated that it is due to the influence of the persons holding the river puramboke that the respondent has not taken any action. It is contended that the illegal occupation of public property, especially river puramboke, is a serious matter as it adversely affects the interests of innocent persons engaged in agricultural activities. Accordingly, the R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :5: following reliefs were sought in the writ petition:
"i) Call for the entire records relating to Ext. P1 and P3 from the respondent;
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction or order to the respondent to dispose Ext. P1 representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and affected parties as expeditiously as possible within the time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. The writ petition came up for admission on 11.10.2023 and this Court disposed of it on the same day directing the respondent District Collector to take up Ext. P1 representation for consideration and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the persons named in Ext. P1 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four months R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :6: from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
4. The review petitioner states that, pursuant to the said judgment, the Deputy Collector (LR), Pathanamthitta, issued Annexure-4 notice to the petitioner, his wife, her mother and other members of her family for a hearing on 16.11.2023. Further that, there are civil litigations between the members of the families of the review petitioner and the writ petitioner and the writ petitioner is not having title over the properties mentioned in Ext. P1 representation based on judgments of civil Court, and Regular Second Appeals are pending before this Court. It is contended that the writ petition was filed disguising as a simple writ petition seeking direction for consideration of a representation. However, in fact, it was to circumvent R.S.A. Nos. 451 and 452 of R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :7: 2023 pending before this Court and to harass the review petitioner and his family that the writ petition was filed without making him and others named in Ext. P1 representation in the party array. It is stated that the writ petitioner has approached this Court suppressing material facts and misleading the Court, obtained the judgment. Accordingly, it is prayed that the judgment dated 11.10.2023 be reviewed and recalled and the writ petition be dismissed with exemplary costs.
5. A counter affidavit has been filed by the writ petitioner in the review petition contending, inter alia, that the review petition is not maintainable as there is no averment of error apparent on the face of records. It is stated that the prayers in R.S.A. Nos. 451 and 452 of 2023 filed by him are different from R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :8: the reliefs sought for in Ext. P1 representation and the plaint schedule property in the suit which led to R.S.A. No. 452 of 2023 has no relation to the properties referred to in Ext. P1. In the counter affidavit, the writ petitioner has narrated the details of civil cases and has produced copies of deeds, information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005, plaints, written statements, orders of Civil Courts, certificates, etc., to negate the averments in the review petition. It is stated that the intention behind filing the review petition is to escape from the criminal activities committed by him and that there is no error apparent on the face of the judgment under review as this Court only directed the respondent in the writ petition to pass orders on Ext. P1 representation after hearing the parties concerned. R.P.No.1198 of 2023 :9: The review petitioner, who is the 12 th respondent in Ext. P1 representation, can raise his objections before the District Collector and the pendency of the second appeal has nothing to do with the disposal of Ext. P1 by the District Collector.
6. The review petitioner has filed a reply to the counter affidavit of the writ petitioner contending that averments and allegations therein are baseless, malicious and defamatory. He has also produced Annexure-7 copy of the common judgment dated 15.12.2023 dismissing R.S.A. Nos. 451 and 452 of 2023 for non prosecution.
7. An additional counter affidavit is also placed on record by the writ petitioner refuting the averments in the reply affidavit and reiterating his contentions in the counter affidavit. R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 10 :
8. The writ petitioner has filed I.A No.4/2024 in the review petition under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for initiating action against the review petitioner for filing false affidavit in support of stay petition in the review petition.
9. Heard Sri. B.G. Harindranath, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sr. John @ Ashok, the writ petitioner, who appeared in person. Apart from advancing lengthy arguments relying on the documents in the counter affidavit, Sri. John has also submitted an argument note.
10. Sri. Harindranath contends that the impugned judgment was passed without compliance with the principle of audi alteram partem. It is further contended that although the writ petition appears to be innocuous, it cannot be so perceived, as there is R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 11 : hidden intention behind the seemingly harmless prayer of the writ petitioner. The contents of Ext. P1 representation are not reflected in the writ petition and there are suppression of material facts and he has approched this Court with unclean hands and that the writ petitioner's attempt is to circumvent the orders of the Civil Court. Refering to various averments in the counter affidavit and the documents produced, it is contended by the learned counsel for the review petitioner that the intention of the writ petitioner is to malign and defame the review petitioner. It is submitted that there are errors apparant on the face of records and the judgment is to be reviewed and recalled and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs.
11. Sri. John would contend that there are no R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 12 : errors apparent on the face of records to review the judgment. It is submitted that the review petitioner who is the 12th respondent in Ext. P1 representation is not a party to the suits or the Regular Second Appeals and would get opportunity of hearing before the District Collector while considering Ext. P1 representation as per the direction in the judgment. It is contended that the relief claimed in Ext. P1 representation is entirely different from the prayers in the suits and it is the review petitioner who has suppressed material facts. Sri. John also prays for initiating proceedings against the review petitioner for filing false affidavit before this Court. Arguments were also advanced as to the merits of the civil disputes. Sri. John, accordingly, prays for dismissal of the review petition with costs.
R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 13 :
12. The prayer in the writ petition is for direction to the sole respondent, the District Collector to dispose of Ext. P1 representation after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and affected parties within a time frame. In Ext. P1 representation, the review petitioner, his wife and her relatives have been arrayed as respondents and various allegations are raised against them and various reliefs including cancellation of assignment, mutation, thandaper accounts and initiation of criminal proceedings are sought. It is contended by the review petitioner that some of the properties mentioned in Ext. P1 representation are the subject matter of civil suits which culminated in R.S.A. Nos. 451 and 452 of 2023 and these facts could not be brought to the notice of this Court as the review R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 14 : petitioner and the persons arrayed as respondents in Ext. P1 representation were not made parties to the writ petition.
13. The writ petition has been filed and presented as a routine one for an expeditious disposal of a representation before a statutory authority. Admittedly, there are civil disputes between the writ petitioner and those arrayed as respondents in Ext. P1 representation and some of the properties mentioned in Ext. P1 representation are stated to be the subject matter of R.S.A. Nos. 451 and 452 of 2023. Therefore, the contention of the review petitioner that the statements in the writ petition require to be subjected to a greater scrutiny has to be accepted. There is an error apparent on the face of record which necessitates a review of the judgment. R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 15 : Accordingly, the review petition is allowed. The judgment dated 11.10.2023 in W.P.(C) No.33354 of 2023 is recalled. Post the writ petition as per roster, for fresh consideration.
As regards I.A. No. 4 of 2024, I find that there are no convincing materials and no grounds are made out for initiating prosecution against the review petitioner under Section 340 Cr.P.C. The said interlocutory application is, accordingly, closed.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 16 : APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF STATUS QUO DATED 12-07-2023 I.A. NO. 1/2023 IN R.S.A 452/2023 OBTAINED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE "INJUNCTION" ORDER DATED 12-07-2023 IN IA NO.1/2023 IN RSA NO.452/2023 PURPORTEDLY ISSUED ON 18-08- 2023 BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
Annexure 3 A TRUE COPY OF THE CLARIFICATION ORDER DATED 08-09-2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN R.S.A. 452/2023.
Annexure 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NUMBERED AS DCPTA/4830/2023-C12 DATED 30-10-2023 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.R.) PATHANAMTHITTA.
ANNEXURE 5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGEMENT IN O.S. 34/2016 AND O.S. 93/2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUBORDINATE COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA. ANNEXURE 6 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGEMENT DATED 30-03-2023 IN BOTH A.S. 15/2021 AND A.S. 16/2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA ANNEXURE 7 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGEMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN R.S.A 452/2023 AND R.S.A 451/2023 DATED 15-12-2023.
ANNEXURE 8 A TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THAT LATE SHRI. JOSEPH GEORGE DONATED THE TWO CENTS OF LAND FOR THE ANGANWADI RESPONDENT ANNEXURES ANNEXURE R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO. 34/2016 OF SUB COURT, PATHANMTHITTA (ORIGINALLY FILED BEFORE OS. NO. 84/2003 OF HON.
MUNSIFF COURT PTA DATED 13-02 -2003) ANNEXURE R1(B) READABLE COPY OF THE UDAMPADI DEED 4925/1951 OF SRO CHENGANNUR DATED 11-10- 1951 R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 17 : ANNEXURE R1(C) TRUE READABLE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.
1908/1941 BEFORE THIS HON. COURT ANNEXURE R1(D) TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.
1613/1114 (1939) OF SRO PATHANAMTHITTA ANNEXURE R1(E) TRUE COPY BASIC LAND TAX RECEIPT OF THE PLAINT SCHEDULED PROPERTY IN O.S NO. 34/2016 DATED 06-01-2021 HAVING TA NO.1456, SURVEY NO. 540/5-3 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE ANNEXURE R1(F) TRUE COPY BASIC LAND TAX RECEIPT OF THE PLAINT SCHEDULED PROPERTY IN OS NO. 34/2016 DATED 02-04-2022, FOR THE YEAR 2022-2023, HAVING TA NO.1456, SURVEY NO. 540/5-3 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE ANNEXURE R1(G) TRUE COPY POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF THE PLAINT SCHEDULED PROPERTY IN OS NO. 34/2016 DATED 01-02-2022 HAVING TA NO.1456, SURVEY NO. 540/5-3 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE ANNEXURE R1(H) TRUE COPY POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF THE PLAINT SCHEDULED PROPERTY IN OS NO. 34/2016 DATED 04-04-2022 HAVING TA NO.1456, SURVEY NO. 540/5-3 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE ANNEXURE R1(I) TRUE COPY OF CLARIFICATION CERTIFICATE NO.
933/08 DATED 07-06-2008 FROM VILLAGE OFFICER STATING THE PROPERTY HAVING SURVEY NO.540-1-5 IS THE SAME PROPERTY SHOWN AS SURVEY NO. 540-5-3 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE EXHIBIT R1(J) TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION DATED 1.2.2014 ANNEXURE R1(K) TRUE COPY REPLY LETTER RECEIVED FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER, ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE NO. 04/14, DATED 18-02-2014 ANNEXURE R1(L) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER OF ARUVAPULAM PANCHAYAT DATED 18- 12- 2014 ANNEXURE R1(M) TRUE COPY REPLY LETTER OF THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, AST. ENGINEER, PWD, KONNY, NO KS10/2008 DATED 23-01-2015 ANNEXURE R1(N) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16-04-2021 WRITTEN TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER, FINANCE DEPT, FINANCE NODAL SECTION, GOVT.
R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 18 :
SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM TO KNOW THE DETAILS OF TRANCHE XV11 PROJECT NAME - MURINJAKAL - ATHIRUNKAL - KULATHUMON - KALLELI -
ELIYARACKAL ROAD EXTENSION FROM ATHIRUNKAL
- NJAVEL CHECK POST ANNEXURE R1(O) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY FROM THE DEPUTY SECRETARY AND STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER NO.1, FINANCE DEPT. TRIVANDRUM, DATED 29-04-2021 ANNEXURE R1(P) TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED LOAN SANCTIONED REPORT IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE PROJECT AS ITEM NO. 26 DATED 28-12-2011 FROM THE HON. GOVERNOR, STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, GOVT. OF KERALA, REF. RIDF-1 (RIDF XV11 KERALA) ANNEXURE R1(Q) TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSION REPORT IN IA NO. 474/2014 IN OS NO. 93/2013 DATED 12-03-2015 ANNEXURE R1(R) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A NO. 467/2017 IN OS NO. 34/2016 DATED 18-09-2017 ANNEXURE R1(S) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA 647/2017 IN CMA NO 51/2017 OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA WHICH WAS DISMISSED ON 11- 04-2018 ANNEXURE R1(T) TRUE COPY OF THE NOT PRESS MEMO DATED 07.06.2018 ANNEXURE R1(U) TRUE COPY OF THE JOINT WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE DEFENDNAS 1 AND 2 DATED 17.11.2003 ANNEXURE R1(V) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER WRITTEN TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER, ARUVAPULAM DATED 13- 02-2017 ANNEXURE R1(W) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY RECEIVED FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER ARUVAPULAM DATED 16-03- 2017 NO. 05/7 ANNEXURE R1(X) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER WRITTEN TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER, ARUVAPULAM DATED 26- 03-2019 ANNEXURE R1(Y) TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER, FROM THE INFORMATION OFFICER ARUVAPULAM DATED 09 R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 19 : -05-2019 NO. 03/2019 ANNEXURE R1(Z) TRUE COPY OF THE TA NO 8786 OF ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE OF D11 DATED 02.08.2012 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT OF LAND R1(ZA) TAX RECEIPT OF ACHAMMA JOSEPH IN TA NO.
1917 OF KONNY VILLAGE DATED 18.10.1977 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO.2162 OF R1(ZB) 1978 OF SRO KONNY DATED 14-08-1978 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO 1522 OF 2021 OF R1(ZC) KONNY SRO ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE TA NO.1937 AS PER PV R1(ZD) NO.153/2004 DATED 17-06-2004 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE TA NO. 1937 OF ARUVAPULAM R1(ZE) VILLAGE OF 1ST DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT DATED 02.08.2017 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE TA NO. 1938 OF ARUVAPULAM R1(ZF) VILLAGE OF 2ND DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT DATED 02.08.2017 ANNEXURE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF 1ST DEFENDANT IN R1(ZG) THE SUIT DATED 20-02-2003 NO. 354/2003 HAVING SURVEY NO. 540-1-1-218, TA NO. 1937, HAVING AN EXTENT OF 14.77 ARE ( 36.50 CENTS) DATED 20.02.2003 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE OF 2ND R1(ZH) DEFENDANT IN THE SUIT DATED 20-02-2003 NO.
356/2003 HAVING SURVEY NO. 540-1-1-218, TA NO. 1938, HAVING AN EXTENT OF 06.27 ARE ( 15.50 CENTS) DATED 20.02.2003 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17-09-2020 R1(ZI) WRITTEN TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER, ARUVAPULAM GRAMMA PANCHAYAT BY MARIAMMA GEORGE DW1 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER FROM THE R1(ZJ) STATE INFORMATION OFFICER, GRAMMA PANCHAYAT, NO. 817/2020/A3 DATED 10-03-2020 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF INFORMATION SOUGHT UNDER THE R1(ZK) RTI ACT TO THE INFORMATION OFFICER ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE DATED 22-01-2013 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER FROM THE R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 20 : R1(ZL) INFORMATION OFFICER, ARUVAPULAM VILLAGE NO.
05/13 DATED 20-02-2013 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE SURVEY PLAN DATED R1(ZM) 24.03.2003 HAVING A FABRICATED SY NO 540/1- 1-298 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER CRLMP NO.84/2007 OF R1(ZN) THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 15-01-2007 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM DATED 23.08.2014 R1(ZO) PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS ITEM DATED 18.06.2009 R1(ZP) PUBLISHED IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 8.06.2000 R1(ZQ) ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED R1(ZR) 3.4.2017 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE PUBLIC R1(ZS) INFORMATION OFFICER, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REF. NO.P10-233/2019 DATED 07-05- 2019 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE PUBLIC R1(ZT) INFORMATION OFFICER, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REF. NO.P10-322/2019 DATED 02-07- 2019 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE PUBLIC R1(ZU) INFORMATION OFFICER, HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA REF. NO.P10-294/2021 DATED 13-09- 2021 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER WRITTEN TO THE R1(ZV) HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KERALA DATED 10-
10-2023
ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17/11/2023IN
R1(ZV) R.S.A NO.451 OF 2023
ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF RAJAGIRI
R1(ZW) HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM DATED 20.09.2023 TO
25.09.2023 OF ADV.LATHISH SEBASTIAN ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL CERTIFICATE FROM SREE R1(ZX) CHITHIRA THIRUNAL MEDICAL SECIENCES AND R.P.No.1198 of 2023 : 21 : TECHNOLOGY, TRIVANDRUM DATED 28/05/2014 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE TREATMENT FOR SOME FUNGAL R1(ZY) INFECTION - UROLOGICAL ISSUE, BALANTIS
-STEROID CREAM AND ANTI-FUNGAL TREATMENT FOLLOWED BY CIRCUMSISION ON 30.09.2023 AND TREATMENT PRESCRIPTION DATED 30.09.2023 FROM DR.SUNIL MENON, YOGYARAJ MEDICAL CENTRE, TRIVANDRUM ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF DISCHARGE SUMMARY DATED R1(ZZ) 25.12.2023 TO 27/12/2023 FOR SURGERY AT SUT HOSPITAL, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD LETTER DATED R1(ZZA) 29/04/2013 ANNEXURE TRUE COPY OF PAPER CUTTING OF MALAYALA R1(ZZB) MANORAMA DATED 25/09/2013