K.T. Mathew vs The Bar Council Of India

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10430 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

K.T. Mathew vs The Bar Council Of India on 11 April, 2024

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S.
   THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 7792 OF 2018


PETITIONER/S:

            K.T. MATHEW
            AGED 58 YEARS
            S/O. THOMAS,KURUVANTHANATHU HOUSE,
            KOLANI P.O. THODUPUZHA,
            IDUKKI DISTRICT-685608.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN
            SRI.DIPU JAMES
            SRI.GEORGE MATHEW
            SRI.M.D.SASIKUMARAN
            SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G
            SRI.SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN


RESPONDENT/S:

    1       THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
            21 ROSE AVENUE, INSTITUTIONAL AREA,
            NEW DELHI-110002, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
    2       THE BAR COUNCIL OF KERALA
            BAR COUNCIL BHAVAN, NEAR HIGH COURT CAMPUS,
            ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682031
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
            BY ADV SRI.T.T.RAKESH


            SRI.RAJITH, S.C, FOR R1

    THIS     WRIT    PETITION      (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON     11.04.2024,     THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P. (C) No.7792 of 2018                2



                       EASWARAN S. , J.
                     -------------------------
                  W.P. (C) No.7792 of 2018
                -----------------------------------
             Dated this the 11th day of April 2024

                               JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

i) to call for the records which lead to the issuance of Ext.P3 to the extent it demanded payment of Special Fee under different heads in Column 5 Additional Fees for the Candidates if applicable and to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the same;
ii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to accept the application for enrollment submitted by the petitioner without insisting payment of Special Fee and permit the petitioner to enroll as an advocate in the next enrollment function;
iii) to declare that the Special Fee prescribed in Ext.P3 is illegal, unconstitutional and ultra vires the Advocates Act, Bar Council of India Rules and Kerala Bar Council Rules.

2. The petitioner states that he was a permanent employee of the Idukki District Cooperative Bank Ltd. and, while in service he had obtained graduation in law. After his W.P. (C) No.7792 of 2018 3 retirement on 31.01.2018, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 application for admission as an advocate on the roll of the Bar Council of Kerala, but, the same was not accepted by the 2 nd respondent stating that the petitioner has not remitted the spcial fee prescribed as per Ext.P3.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the demand of special fee apart from the general fee is illegal and without jurisdiction.

4. The question as to whether, for enrollment as an advocate - post-employment/retirement, levy of the special fee is proper or not came up for consideration before this Court in Koshy T v. Bar Council of Kerala, Ernakulam and Another [2017 KHC 553] wherein a learned Single Judge of this Court has held that levy of the special fee is ultra vires and unauthorized.

5. I am in respectful agreement with the dictum laid down by the Single Bench in Koshy T. (Supra). Accordingly, following the aforesaid judgment, Ext.P3 to the extent of insisting special fee on the petitioner is quashed. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner has enrolled as a lawyer on W.P. (C) No.7792 of 2018 4 16.12.2018 pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 8.3.2018. Since this Court has held that levy of special fee is ultra vires under the Constitution of India it is declared that the petitioner need not remit such fee.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S. JUDGE NS W.P. (C) No.7792 of 2018 5 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7792/2018 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF DEGREE CERTIFICATE DTD.

                      19.12.2000        ISSUED     BY     BANGALORE
                      UNIVERSITY
EXHIBIT P2:           TRUE         COPY        OF        ORDER

NO.HRM/26/0001/RETIREMENT TO STAFF/2017- 18 DTD 01.01.2018 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF ENROLLMENT FEE STRUCTURE DTD. NIL PUBLISHED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN ITS OFFICIAL WEBSITE.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR ENROLMENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 03.03.2018 EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF INTERIM ORDER IN W.P.(C) NO.4990 OF 2017 DTD.16.02.2017