Kerala High Court
V Rajendran vs S Valsala on 5 April, 2024
Author: Kauser Edappagath
Bench: Kauser Edappagath
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 16TH CHAITHRA, 1946
CRP NO. 128 OF 2024
ORDER DATED 25.01.2024 IN EP 54/17 IN OS NO.342 OF 2014 OF
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT ,NEYYATTINKARA
REVISION PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTORS/DEFENDANTS IN SUIT:
1 V RAJENDRAN, AGED 51 YEARS
KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O,
PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM, T PARASSUVAIKKAL
VILLAGEHIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695508
2 VIJAYAN, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O DASAN NADAR ( LATE)
KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O,
PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM PARASSUVAIKKAL
VILLAGE,THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695508
3 NIRMALA, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O DASAN NADAR ( LATE)
KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O,
PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM PARASSUVAIKKAL VILLAGE,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695508
4 SREEDHARAN, AGED 44 YEARS
S/O DASAN NADAR ( LATE) KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM
PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O, PARASSUVAIKKAL VILLAGE
PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN -
695508
5 ANITHA, AGED 43 YEARS
D/O DASAN NADAR ( LATE) KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM
PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O, PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM
PARASSUVAIKKAL VILLAGE, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN -
695508
C.R.P.No.128/2024
-:2:-
6 LATHA,AGED 38 YEARS
D/O DASAN NADAR ( LATE) KAITHAKULANGARAVILAKOM
PURAYIDOM PARASUVAIKKAL P O, PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM
PARASSUVAIKKAL VILLAGE THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN -
695508
BY ADVS.S.KRISHNA
GOVIND R.
ADI NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF IN SUIT:
S VALSALA,AGED 59 YEARS
W/O APPU, VALSALA BHAVAN PARASUVAIKKAL P O,
PARASSUVAIKKAL DESOM PARASSUVAIKKAL VILLAGE,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695508
BY ADVS.Vinod Bhat S
ANAGHA LAKSHMY RAMAN(K/000767/2015)
GREESHMA CHANDRIKA.R(K/807/2020)
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 05.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.R.P.No.128/2024
-:3:-
ORDER
An order dismissing an application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 16.3.2023 in E.P.No.54/2017 of the Additional Munsiff Court-II, Neyyattinkara is under challenge in this CRP.
2. The review petition filed by the judgment debtor has been dismissed on the ground that it is barred by limitation. Sri. S. Vinod Bhat, the learned counsel for the decree holder fairly conceded that the review petition is not barred by limitation. I also find that it is not barred by limitation. Hence, the impugned order is set aside. The Additional Munsiff Court-II, Neyyattinkara is directed to dispose of E.A.No.14/2023 in accordance with law, after hearing both sides. Thereafter, the learned Munsiff shall proceed to dispose of E.P.No.54/2017 as well, as expeditiously as possible.
The CRP is disposed of.
Sd/-
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp