IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944
OP (WAKF) NO. 16 OF 2022
(O.S.NO. 36/2022 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE)
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF NO.2:
SRI.P.ABDUL KHADER @ KUNJAPPA,
AGED 82 YEARS
S/O.AHAMMED, PUZHAKKAL HOUSE,
KIDANGAYAM P.O., PANTHALLOOR AMSOM,
KIDANGAYAM DESOM, ERANAD TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, , PIN - 676521
BY ADVS.
P.MARTIN JOSE
P.PRIJITH
THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
AJAY BEN JOSE
R.GITHESH
MANJUNATH MENON
SACHIN JACOB AMBAT
ANNA LINDA V.J
HARIKRISHNAN S.
S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF NO.1 & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6:
1 MUSLIM BROTHERS ASSOCIATION,
KIDANGAYAM, PANTHALLOOR AMSOM,
KIDANGAYAM DESOM, PANTHALLOOR P.O.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
SRI.P.ABDUL KHADER @ KUNJAPPA,
S/O.AHAMMED, PUZHAKKAL HOUSE, KIDANGAYAM P.O.,
PANTHALLOOR AMSOM, KIDANGAYAM DESOM, ERANAD TALUK,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676521
2 C.K.IBRAHIM MASTER,
AGED 69 YEARS
S/O.MUHAMMED,
CHULLICKULAVAN HOUSE, KIDANGAYAM P.O.,
:2:
OP(WAKF) No.16 of 2022
PANTHALLOOR AMSOM, KIDANGAYAM DESOM,
ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676521
3 KIDANGAYAM MUSLIM BROTHERS ASSOCIATION,
KIDANGAYAM, PANTHALLOOR AMSOM,
KIDANGAYAM DESOM PANTHALLOOR P.O.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
C.K.IBRAHIM MASTER, S/O.MUHAMMED,
CHULLICKULAVAN HOUSE, KIDANGAYAM P.O.,
PANTHALLOOR AMSOM, KIDANGAYAM DESOM,
ERANAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, , PIN - 676521
4 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
MALAPPURAM, MALAPPURAM P.O, PIN - 676505
5 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, MALAPPURAM , PIN - 676505
6 ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
MANJERI, MANJERI P.O,
MALAPPURAM DISRICT,
PIN - 676121
7 KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
VIP ROAD, KALOOR,
KOCHI, PIN - 682017
BY ADV JAMSHEED HAFIZ
THIS OP (WAKF) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
:3:
OP(WAKF) No.16 of 2022
JUDGMENT
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
Inasmuch as this OP(WAKF) has been preferred even before an order has been passed by the WAKF Tribunal, we are of the view that such an OP(WAKF) cannot be maintained under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before this Court. Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to prefer an OP(WAKF) against any order to be passed by the Tribunal, if so advised, this OP(WAKF) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE mns