IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
RP NO. 354 OF 2022
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
UNNI, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. PRABHAKARAN,
VALAKKATTIL HOUSE, KURAVILANGAD KARA,
MEENACIL TALUK, KURAVILANGAD P.O.,
KOTTATYAM, PIN- 686633
BY ADV M.NARENDRA KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 DEPUTY SUPRERIENTENDENT OF POLICE
OFFICE OF DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
VAIKKOM, KOTTAYAM , PIN - 686141
3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER (CIRCLE INSPECTOR)
KURAVILANGAD POLICE STATION, KURAVILANGAD P.O,
KOTTAYAM , PIN - 686633
4 SUNNY SEBASTIAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. DEVASYA @
SEBASTIAN,PALLIVADAKKEDATHU HOUSE, KURAVILANGAD
KARA, KURAVILANGAD VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK,
KURAVILANGAD P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN- 686633,
PIN - 686633
5 ALEYAMMA KURIAKOSE, AGED 71 YEARS
W/O KURIAKOSE, MURICKAL HOUSE, MEENACHIL TALUK,
KURAVILANGAD KARA, KURAVILANGAD VILLAGE, MEENACHIL
TALUK, KURAVILANGAD P.O. KOTTAYAM , PIN - 686633
SMT MABLE C KURIAN SR GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP 354/22
2
O R D E R
This petition, seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 18.11.2021, has been impelled asserting that the competent Civil Court has already delivered a final judgment and decree in the disputes between the parties, as is evident from Exts.P1 and P2.
2. Even when I hear Sri.M.Narendra Kumar - learned counsel for the petitioner, on the afore lines, it does not require this Court to modify the judgment because, what I have directed is that the parties must abide by the orders from the Civil Court to be obtained in future. If such orders have already been issued, as has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, necessarily, the parties will have to accede to its terms and I do not think that this Court requires to make any modification.
Resultantly, this Review Petition is closed; however, clarifying that the intent of this Court was that the parties must RP 354/22 3 abide by every judgment or decree of the Civil Court - either issued or to be issued in future.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
RP 354/22
4
APPENDIX OF RP 354/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A THE TRUE COPY OF THE PAINT IN O.S.
NO.229/2021 IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFFS, PALA FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT, DATED 21.10.2021