Rajan Pillai vs Gopinathan Nair

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
  FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                       RP NO. 378 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(C) NO.3322/2018 OF HIGH COURT
                             OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:

    1       RAJAN PILLAI, AGED 61 YEARS,
            S/O.PARAMESWARAN PILLAI,
            THEKKEDATHU PARAMBIL, KUMARAKAM MURI,
            KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 563.

    2       JAYASREE, AGED 56 YEARS,
            S/O.RAJAN PILLAI,
            THEKKEDATHU PARAMBIL, KUMARAKAM MURI,
            KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 563.

            BY ADVS.
            M.V.THAMBAN
            R.REJI
            THARA THAMBAN
            B.BIPIN
            ARUN BOSE
            SUNEESH KUMAR R.

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

            GOPINATHAN NAIR, S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR,
            NIKUNJAM, PALLARIMANGALAM MURI,
            THEKKEKARA VILLAGE,
            MAVELIKARA TALUK. PIN-690 101.

            BY ADV. SRI.A.SHAFEEK (KAYAMKULAM)

        THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.05.2022,    THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 RP.No.378 of 2022
    IN
OP(C) No.3322 of 2022
                               2




                        O R D E R

Heard at length. Nothing substantiated to review a well considered judgment passed on merits.

Accordingly, this review petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE. ww RP.No.378 of 2022 IN OP(C) No.3322 of 2022 3 APPENDIX OF RP 378/2022 PETITIONERS' ANNEXURE: ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT ALONG WITH THE COVERING LETTER DATED 16.06.2015 ISSUED BY THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, DYSP NRI CELL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.