The Pentecostal Mission vs District Collector

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5502 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
The Pentecostal Mission vs District Collector on 20 May, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
        FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                        WP(C) NO. 21248 OF 2012
PETITIONER:

            THE PENTECOSTAL MISSION
            NAGAMPADAM WAREHOUSE ROAD, SACRED HEART (SH) MOUNT
            POST, KOTTAYAM - 686 006, REPRESENTED BY ITS PASTOR IN
            CHARGE SRI. MAMMEN THOMAS.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL


RESPONDENTS:

    1       DISTRICT COLLECTOR
            COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
    2       DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
            KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
    3       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME
            AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
    4       KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY
            KOTTAYAM - 686 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY
            SRI.SIBY CHENAPPADY, SC, KOTTAYAM MUNICIPALITY
            SRI.MATHEW JOHN K
            SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
            SRI.SIBY MATHEW
            SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 21248 OF 2012

                             2




                P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
               ------------------------------
              W.P.(C).No. 21248 of 2012
       ----------------------------------------------
         Dated this the 20th day of May, 2022


                     JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that there is no instruction from his client.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Sd/-

                                  P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
DM                                        JUDGE