Benazeer Riyas vs The Secretary

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5113 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Benazeer Riyas vs The Secretary on 6 May, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
  FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 16TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                    WP(C) NO. 15439 OF 2022
PETITIONER    :

         BENAZEER RIYAS, AGED 42 YEARS,
         S/O. KUNHAYANKUTTY, RIYAS MANZIL, NADUVANNUR,
         KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE 673 614

         BY ADV I.DINESH MENON



RESPONDENTS    :

    1    THE SECRETARY,
         REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REGIONAL
         TRANSPORT OFFICE, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE 673 101.

    2    THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
         JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, THALASSERY P.O,
         THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT4 670 101.

    3    K.V ABOOBACKER SIDHIQUE,
         S/O. MOIDEEN KOYA, K.V HOUSE, AREEKADU,
         NALLALAM P.O, KOZHIKODE 673 027.



         BY MS.REKHA C NAIR, GP.



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP           FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME           DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.15439 of 2022                    -2-


                               GOPINATH.P, J
                   ----------------------------------------------
                         WP(C) No.15439 of 2022
                    ----------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 6th day of May, 2022

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction seeking consideration of Ext.P3 objection filed by him against transfer of vehicle bearing registration No.KL-58 T 8696.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of directing the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and 3rd respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief being granted in this writ petition, I am of the opinion that notice to the 3 rd respondent can be dispensed with.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and 3 rd respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

                                                                 JUDGE

amk
 WP(C) No.15439 of 2022               -3-



                     APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15439/2022



PETITIONER'S      EXHIBITS :

Exhibit P1     TRUE COPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT DATED 29-03-2021.

Exhibit P2     TRUE COPY OF THE RC PARTICULARS OF THE VEHICLE KL
               58 T 8696.

Exhibit P3     TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 4-5-2022.

Exhibit P4     TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM IN WP(C)NO. 1013/2022
               DATED 12-01-2022

Exhibit P5     TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 1013/2022
               DATED 28-1-2022




RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS          :   NIL.