Safeer T.M.V vs The Station House Officer

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
         WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
                           WP(C) NO. 21171 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:

     1      SAFEER T.M.V
            AGED 35 YEARS,
            S/O K.P. IBRAHIM, SAREENA MAHAL,
            KAYARALAMOTTA,
            MAYYIL, KANNUR-670602
     2      SAREENA KHADER
            AGED 37 YEARS,
            S/O K.P. IBRAHIM, SAREENA MAHAL,
            KAYARALAMOTTA,
            MAYYIL, KANNUR-670602

            BY ADVS.
            SHABU SREEDHARAN
            SIDHARTHAN V.K.
            JINSON OUSEPH
            CHITRA VIJAYAN
            ABDUL HAMEED
            NIMISHA GEORGE
            APARNA M. NAIR


RESPONDENTS:

     1      THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
            CHEEMENI POLICE STATION, CHEEMENI,
            KASARGOD, PIN-671313

     2      HDG FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER,
            ZENITH HOUSE, OPP.MAHALAXMI RACE COURSE,
            KESAV KHADE MARG, MUMBAI- 400034
            BY ADV. AMMINIKUTTY K., GOVERNMENT PLEADER



     THIS   WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 21171 OF 2022
                                        2




                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022 This writ petition if filed aggrieved by the action taken by the 2nd respondent, a private non-banking financial institution, from which the 1 st petitioner had availed a loan. The petitioners are also aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 1 st respondent Station House Officer in taking steps to avert the threat extended by the 2nd respondent.

Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader, I find the issue to be purely private in nature and the remedy therefore, is to approach the Civil Court.

Hence, the writ petition is closed, reserving the petitioners' remedy to approach the appropriate forum.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN JUDGE NB/29-6 WP(C) NO. 21171 OF 2022 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21171/2022 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 10.05.2022 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE