CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.23055/2021 DATED 25.11.2021 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
APARNA MOHAN
OFFICE ATTENDANT APPOINTEE
RESIDING AT KANJIRAPPARA NALUKETTU
PRAKKANAM P.O.
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,PIN - 689643
BY ADV V.B.PREMACHANDRAN
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
ANITHA P I
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME OF THE NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER,
THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
KOZHENCHERY,THEKKEMALA P O,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT,, PIN - 695654
SMT. NISHA BOSE, SR. GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 28.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
By judgment dated 25.11.2021 in W.P.(C) No.23055 of 2021, this Court had quashed Ext.P18 order and directions were issued to the AEO, Kozhencherry to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Office Attendant on a regular scale of pay basis in the M.G.U.P School, Prakkanam from the date of appointment i.e., 01.08.2017 and disburse all consequential benefits that the petitioner is entitled to. Alleging non-compliance of the directions, the petitioner is before this Court with this contempt case.
2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that in terms of the directions issued, by order dated 16.05.2022, the approval of the appointment of the petitioner as Office Attendant on a regular scale of pay basis was granted from 01.08.2017 and the salary bill was sanctioned and forwarded to the Treasury for the period from 1.08.2017 to 30.06.2019. For the subsequent period, the petitioner herein had taken LWA for pursuing B.Ed. and hence, she cannot claim any entitlement.
3. Sri. V.B. Premachandran, the learned counsel appearing for the CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022 3 petitioner, however, submitted that the petitioner has not received the benefits to which she is entitled to, to date.
4. As the respondent has complied with the directions in the judgment in its letter and spirit, no case of contempt is made out. If the petitioner is in any way aggrieved, she can raise her grievance in appropriate proceedings.
This Contempt Case (C) is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE NS CON.CASE(C) NO. 722 OF 2022 4 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 722/2022 PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURES :
Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID JUDGMENT DATED 20.1.2021 IN W.P.(C) NO.2244/2020 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A.
NO.1358/2021 DATED 10.11.2021 Annexure A3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.23055/2021 DATED 25.11.2021 Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN THE SAID R.P.
NO.916/2021 DATED 16.12.2021 RESPONDENT(S) ANNEXURES : NIL