IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 20576 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BINOY
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O. JUSA, PULICKAL HOUSE,
ELANTHIKARA P. O.,
PUTHENVELIKKARA, PIN - 683 594.
BY ADV SRI. M.JITHESH MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD,
KOCHI - 682 030,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION,
KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 030.
3 ANAS. K.K.,
S/O. ABDUL KADIR, KUTTAKATH HOUSE,
PERUVARAM, NORTH PARUR
PIN - 683 520.
4 C.K. SAJEEV,
S/O. KUTTAN, CHAKKANALIL HOUSE,
SOUTH ADUVASSERY P. O.,
NORTH PARUR, PIN - 683 578.
SRI. JIMMY GEORGE - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.20576 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
The application of the petitioner for regular permit was considered by the 1st respondent and the same was granted subject to settlement of timings. Since there was a delay in settlement of timings, the petitioner had approached this Court and this Court by Ext.P4 judgment disposed of the writ petition directing the 2nd respondent to convene a timing conference and to have the timings of the petitioner settled with notice to respondents 3 and 4 and other affected persons, if any.
2. Pursuant to Ext.P4 judgment, Exts.P5 and P6 notices were issued to the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4. However, the timing conference was adjourned. In the conference which was held on 14.06.2022, an objection was raised WP(C).No.20576 OF 2022 3 pointing out that the running time given to the petitioner to cover the sector from Elanthikara to North Parur is wrong. Based on the objection, the timing conference was again adjourned.
3. In the light of the objection raised in the meeting scheduled on 14.06.2022, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P7 request with a revised time schedule. He seeks a direction for convening a timing conference and for consideration of Ext.P7.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P7, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after notice to respondents 3 and 4 and settle the timings and issue permit, in accordance with law. WP(C).No.20576 OF 2022 4 The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR WP(C).No.20576 OF 2022 5 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE EXTRACT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 28-10-2021. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE KL- 09/AA.0007.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER PRODUCING THE CURRENT RECORDS DATED 27-12-2021 (WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION).
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT RENDERED BY
THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.
[C]NO.3863/2022 DATED 15-02-2022. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT WHICH WAS SIGNED ON 06-04-2022.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 05-05-
2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT (WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION).
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF LETTER/REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE REVISED TIME SCHEDULE DATED 15.06.2022 (WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION).
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.