Prabha K.K vs District Registrar(General)

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
     FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944
                      WP(C) NO. 16312 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:

              PRABHA K.K.,
              AGED 61 YEARS
              S/O.P.K.K.KUNJAN, KANNAMKERYL, KUMARAKAM,
              KOTTAYAM.
              BY ADV P.V.JAYACHANDRAN

RESPONDENT/S:

      1       DISTRICT REGISTRAR(GENERAL),
              UNDER THE TRAVANCORE COCHIN LITERARY SCIENTIFIC
              AND CHARITABLE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1955,
              KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 001.
      2       THE GOVERNING BODY OF SRI. MUTHANDE NADA
              MAHADEVA SHEKTHRAM,
              REG. NO.K 28/1996, KUMARAKAM SOUTH, KOTTAYAM,
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-686 563.
OTHER PRESENT:

              GP P.S.APPU


          THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON    24.06.2022,   THE   COURT    ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.16312 of 2022

                                     -2-



                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of June, 2022 The petitioner was the former Secretary of the Sri Muthande Nada Mahadeva Kshekthram, which is a society registered under the Travancore-Cochin (Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration) Act. The petitioner has serious complaint about the manner in which the Society is functioning. He also alleges financial fraud by the present office bearers. Pointing out these aspects, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P1 complaint. The writ petition is filed, aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the first respondent in taking action based on the complaint.

3. Learned Government Pleader submitted that, Ext.P1 complaint is not available in the records of the first respondent.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner W.P.(C) No.16312 of 2022 -3- asserted that Ext.P1 complaint was filed and submitted that, if necessary, a copy of the complaint can be made available to the first respondent.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to produce a copy of Ext.P1 or a fresh complaint before the first respondent within two weeks, along with certified copy of this judgment. On receipt of the complaint, the same shall be taken up for consideration and appropriate orders passed thereon within one month.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN JUDGE Scl/24.06.22 W.P.(C) No.16312 of 2022 -4- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16312/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 15.11.2021.