K. Muhammed Haji vs The Mattannur

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7463 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
K. Muhammed Haji vs The Mattannur on 24 June, 2022
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM


                                      PRESENT

                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

               FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944

                              WP(C) NO. 12401 OF 2016

PETITIONER:

               K. MUHAMMED HAJI
               AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. MOIDEEN KUTTY HAJI, PWD CONTRACTOR, MPK MANZIL,
               THERUR, EDAYANNUR P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT-670 595.
               BY ADVS.
               SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN
               SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL
               SRI.NIAS MOOPAN
               SRI.P.SAJU
               SRI.E.M.UNNIKRISHNAN MANJERI


RESPONDENTS:

     1         THE MATTANNUR
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MATTANNUR - 670702.
     2         SECRETARY
               MATTANNUR MUNICIPALITY, MATTANNUR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 702.
     3         STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
     4         KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AGENCY (KINFRA)
               REPRESENTED BY ADVISOR(LM), KINFRA, MATTANNUR.
               BY ADVS.
               R1 & R2 BY SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR
               R3 - SRI.ARAVIND P MATHEW,GOVERNMENT PLEADER
               R4 BY SRI.G.S.RAGHUNATH




      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.06.2022, THE

COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C) No.12401 of 2016                 2




                                  JUDGMENT

Dated this the 17th day of June 2022 This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

i) issue a writ of mandamus or directing the second respondent to release the Bill in respect of works which is duly received and funds are already available, as per the Exhibit-P5 Government Order without effecting earlier quoted Tender percentage.

(ii) issue any other order or direction, to the second respondent to pay interest at appropriate rates, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for the amounts payable to the petitioner

(iii) direct the respondents to pay costs of this proceedings to the petitioner.

2. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous.

Submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

                                                    SHAJI P.CHALY

smv                                                      JUDGE