IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 23°9 pay OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944 MAT.APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 1954/2013 OF FAMILY COURT , TRIVANDRUM APPELLANT/S: DR.DEEPU VIJAYAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O. VIJAYAN, NOOPURAM, PAZHAVADI, NEDUMANGAD P.O., NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER .N.VIJAYAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANAN, NOOPURAM, PAZHAVADI, NEDUMANGAD P.O., NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA) RESPONDENT/S : SURYA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O. REMANY AMMA, TC NO. 50/1011, SREEKRISHNA NAGAR, THALIYAL, KARAMANA P.O., MANACADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.P.E.SAJAL SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23.06.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.21/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 23" pAy OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944 MAT.APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 246/2014 OF FAMILY COURT , TRIVANDRUM APPELLANT/S: DR.DEEPU VIJAYAN, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.VIJAYAN, NOOPURAM, PAZHAVADI, NEDUMANGAD P.O., NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAHPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE P/A. HOLDER N.VIJAYAN, AGED 70 YEARS, $/O.NARAYANAN, NOOPURAM, PAZHAVADI, GEDUMANGAD P.O., NEDUMANGAD VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAHPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA) RESPONDENT/S: SURYA, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.REMANY AMMA, TC NO.50/1011,SREEKRISHNA NAGAR, THALIYAL, KARAMANA P.O., MANACADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-695 001. BY ADVS. SRI .P.E.SAJAL SRI.THIRUMALA P.K.MANI THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23.06.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.19/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT
{Mat .Appeal Nos.19/2018, 21/2018] A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
The parties have resolved. their disputes in mediation. Accordingly, a settlement agreement has been executed. The settlement agreement is on board along with the report of the mediator. In the light of the settlement agreement, the appeals are disposed of. The settlement agreement will form part of the judgment.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE Sd/-
SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE In MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 & 25 OF THE MEDIATION RULES 2005 CIVIL PROCEDURE (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) RULES 2008 Ka wince padend aro In the Court of lb' KLovJ ( Ben OS/AS/CMA/MCICMP/ No. q /se1e, Mat "a AI fopore Plaintiffs/Appellants/Petitioners a D Kh MAT ne ra ob Defendants/Respondents/Counter Petitioners :
Sn s7a The parties above named beg to submit as follows :
1. The aforesaid Suit/Appeal/Petition/Complaint were referred to mediation for solving the dispute between the parties. In the course of mediation they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to the follo na terms and conditions.
» Comiybel maipre Pa elu] 20 esd (ro rg mr 2 ppp B Geo CZ 8>5n0| 3) pile ae OP ph. 1QbA coat be cord ree
(i) pee ong O) Bird rome Bory Bore eet L LP 4, rVOG7D A bole) relepeon__ anita net wa O97 BeOS Le " Bonde oa i Cas wBalrd rove * aD 14 2b] PeIh ~ >> no
(iv) at [to irae O4 rat bp). 19 obi wp PI% 2= {) we) mp) D>
(v) 31 G) G) -é anvd ago 5 )ore/ fvBed Dae of) DO 10> bez, Ide Bd rI Np DSL 137) 19> B~o5 GS). me. GLf PeI3 <g> OP. ne. (4 64 /odelt Shp, cy a NI Vy 2 Ar hye . * K: or. je NB DU
2. In view of the aforesaid agreement entered in to between parties, the parties pray that the suit/Appeal/petition/Complaint be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid agreement.
3. In view of the aforesaid agreement, plaintiftiappellant/petitioner prays for refund of full institution fee.
4, Parties will Appear OM .......csssecsereseereees before the Court for passing Orders/Decree in terms of the above agreement.
A bauer | Srovye Plainfitf/Petitioner/Complainant/Appellant Defendants/CP's/Respondent Advocate for Plain Tse GeO tak nant/Appellant W Hs Advocate for Defendants/GP's/Respondent! ib 5 m VERIFICATION We the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what is contained in paragraph 1 to ............ are true to the best of our knowledge, information and belief.
Place CRensneitias Dag Uy Dated: S&-Q-2\ 2 Sway R pte af Serge R Plaintiff/Petitioner/Complainant/Appellant Defendants/CP's/Respondent