IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 16514 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
RAJU THOMAS
AGED 55 YEARS
VETTIKKOMBIL HOUSE,
MUNDAKAYAM P.O KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686513
BY ADVS.
MANU GOVIND
AYESHA MARIA JOHN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
AYUSH, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN
- 695001
2 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
POLICE HEADQUARTERS, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010, PIN - 682031
3 THE REGISTRAR
KERALA STATE MEDICAL COUNCIL FOR INDIAN SYSTEMS OF
MEDICINE, COMBINED COUNCIL BUILDING, RED CROSS RD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695035
4 CM JAMALUDHEEN
KALARIKKAL HOUSE, THAIKKATTUKARA P.O ALUVA, PIN -
683106
BY ADVS.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER
N.RAGHURAJ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16514 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2022 The petitioner claims to be the President of the State Committee of Ayurveda Medical Association of India (AMAI), which represents all strata of Ayurveda medical graduates like private practitioners, academicians, Doctors in Government Service, researchers etc. The petitioner's grievance is against the fourth respondent, who according to the petitioner is a bogus physician, unqualified to treat people. The fourth respondent is stated to be conducting an establishment named Ibnusina Medication Training Institute without licence or permission. Over and above that, the fourth respondent is indulging in issuance of Diploma certificates in Traditional Ayurveda Medicine and Traditional Ayurvedic Practitioner. Although petitioner has approached the authorities requesting emergent action, no action has been taken so far.
2. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the documents, I find that WP(C) NO. 16514 OF 2022 3 the matter needs emergent and serious consideration.
3. Learned Counsel for the third respondent submitted that, if the relief is confined to consideration of the pending representations, the third respondent is willing to indulge in such exercise.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the competent among the respondents to take up Ext.P4 and to consider the issue highlighted therein, with the seriousness it deserves, and to take appropriate action within two months. To effectuate proper consideration of the issues, petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with certified copy of the judgment.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK WP(C) NO. 16514 OF 2022 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16514/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF ONE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14.03.2022 MADE UNDER THE RTI ACT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 24.03.2022 OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.03.2022 BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENTS 1-3