Kerala High Court
Kayakkal Surendran vs The Director General (Bis) on 23 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 15006 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
S.ABDUL NAZAR
AGED 53 YEARS
ALL KERALA GOLD AND SILVER MERCHANT ASSOCIATION,
KOICKAL JEWELLERS, KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM.
BY ADV A.CHANDRA BABU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (BIS)
HALLMARKING COMMITTEE, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS (BIS)
HEAD QUARTER, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI-
110002, INDIA.
2 THE CONVENER,
(THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BIS), HALLMARKING COMMITTEE,
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS (BIS) HEAD QUARTER, 9
BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI-110002, INDIA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.06.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).15089/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
[WP(C) Nos.15089/2021, 15006/2021]
2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 15089 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
KAYAKKAL SURENDRAN
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O KAYAKKAL ERACHAN, ANUGRAHA REC ROAD, KODUVALLY
P.O.KOZHIKODE PIN-673 572.
BY ADV A.CHANDRA BABU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (BIS)
HALLMARKING COMMITTEE, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
(BIS ) HEAD QUARTER, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW
DELHI-110 002, INDIA
2 THE CONVENER, ( THE DIRECTOR GENERAL BIS)
HALLMARKING COMMITTEE, BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
(BIS ) HEAD QUARTER, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW
DELHI-110 002, INDIA
BY ADV MANOJ RAMASWAMY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.06.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).15006/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
[WP(C) Nos.15089/2021, 15006/2021]
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2022 [WP(C) Nos.15089/2021, 15006/2021] In view of the subsequent developments and the fact that the present grievance is about the manner of implementation of hallmarking, which is beyond the scope of these writ petitions. The writ petitions are hence dismissed, reserving the petitioner's liberty to move afresh.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK