Kannan S. Velinthara vs State Of Kerala

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7114 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Kannan S. Velinthara vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
        FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                        WP(C) NO. 19715 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

            KANNAN S. VELINTHARA
            AGED 37 YEARS
            S/O V. N. SOMANATHAN,
            WORKING AS DEPUTY MANAGER (CIVIL) IN GRADE-10
            (EMP. NO. 1139), KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION
            LIMITED (KAMCO), RESIDING AT 2B4, AIRVIEW APARTMENT,
            ATHANI PO, ERNAKULAM - 683 585.
            BY ADVS.
            SREEDEVI KYLASANATH
            ACHUTH KYLAS
            R.MAHESH MENON
            DEAGO JOHN K
RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT,
            GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
    2       KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LIMITED (KAMCO),
            REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ATHANI,
            ERNAKULAM - 683 585.
    3       THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR),
            KERALA AGRO MACHINERY CORPORATION LIMITED (KAMCO),
            ATHANI, ERNAKULAM - 683 585.
            SRI.M.RAJEEV, GP
            SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 19715 OF 2022

                                     2




                              JUDGMENT

Dated this the 17th day of June, 2022 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an error has crept into the writ petition in as much as the recruitment and promotion rules produced are the incorrect rules and that the same is liable to be amended.

This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach afresh with proper pleadings, materials and parties on record.

Sd/-

ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE NP