IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 24TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 811 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2564/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
MARYSADAN PROJECTS PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
BIBY BABY
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BIBY BABY, WIFE OF SUBIN
GEORGE, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT EDATALA HOUSE, MARYSADAN
BUILDING, KALADY, NEELEESWARAM P.O,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,PIN-
683574
BY ADV K.J.MANU RAJ
RESPONDENTS/2ND, 3RD, 4TH & ADDL.7TH RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
1 1. BIJU PRABHAKAR
FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT,
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695039
2 M.R.AJITHKUMAR
FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERATE, TRANS TOWER,
VAZHUTHACAUD , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
3 SHABEER P.M
FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, ERNAKULAM,
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD-, PIN - 682030
4 MOHAN KRISHNAN P.V
FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
STATE INFORMATICS OFFICER,
NIC KERALA STATE CENTRE,
CDAC BUILDING, VELLAYAMABALAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033
BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
CON.CASE(C) NO. 811 OF 2022
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
Cont.Case (C).No.811 of 2022
==========================
Dated this the 14th day of June, 2022
JUDGMENT
Order dated 04/06/2022 has been passed by the authority in compliance with the directions of this Court dated 29/03/2022 rejecting the petitioner's application. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an application has been submitted by an employee of the petitioner company for grant of BH registration of the vehicle in question. It is for the authorities to consider the same in accordance with law. No orders are called for in the contempt case. The contempt case is accordingly closed.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr 3 CON.CASE(C) NO. 811 OF 2022 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 811/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure MEMO OF CHARGES