K.Venugopal vs Tom Jose Ias

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6174 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
K.Venugopal vs Tom Jose Ias on 1 June, 2022
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

            WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944

                           CON.CASE(C) NO. 2269 OF 2019

         AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7633/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:

     1        T. RAMADASAN
              AGED 61 YEARS
              S/O.KUMARAN, THURUTHUMMEL HOUSE, KUNNATHURA POST, QUILANDI,
              KOZHIKODE.

     2        E.P.SANKARANKUTTY
              AGED 59 YEARS
              S/O.M.K.V.WARIER, MANALIL THRIKKOVIL, CHALIYA, KOYILANDY,
              KOZHIKODE.

     3        V.K.RAJENDRAN,
              AGED 68 YEARS
              S/O.K.KRISHNAN, LAKSHMI HOUSE, ELATHUR, KOZHIKODE.

              BY ADVS.
              SANTHARAM.P
              REKHA ARAVIND
              PAUL P. ABRAHAM



RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:

              TOM JOSE,
              AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, THE CHIEF
              SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.




OTHER PRESENT:

              SRI ASWIN SETHUMADHAVAN-   SR GP




     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

01.06.2022, ALONG WITH Con.Case(C).1924/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CON.CASE(C) NOs. 2269 & 2269 OF 2019

                                        2




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

         WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944

                        CON.CASE(C) NO. 1924 OF 2019

      AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23755/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1, 16, 17, 35 & 36:

     1      K.VENUGOPAL
            AGED 67 YEARS
            S/O KRISHNA KURUP,T.C.41/2649,
            SARASWATHIVILASAM,KUTTIKKADU,
            MANACAUDU(PO),THIRUVANATHAPURAM-695009.

     2      N.X.JOSEPH,
            AGED 66 YEARS
            S/O.N.V.XAVIER,NEDUVILAKATHU HOUSE,
            VARAPUZHA(PO),OLANADU,683517.

     3      T.T.ROBERT,
            AGED 68 YEARS
            S/O THOMAS,THOTTAKATHU VEEDU,OCHANTHURUTHU,
            PUTHUVIPU(PO),ERNAKULAM-682508.

     4      M.J.ABRAHAM,
            AGED 66 YEARS
            S/O JOSEPH,MENACHERY HOUSE,KOONAMMAVU(PO),
            VIA ALUVA-683519.

     5      VARADARAJAN.K.K,
            AGED 67 YEARS
            S/O KARUNAKARAN NAIR,KUTTACKADA HOUSE,
            KOTTUVALLY,KAITHARAM.P.O,PARAVUR-683519.

            BY ADVS.
            N.S.GOPAKUMAR
            SRI.S.MOHANA KUMARAN NAIR



RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:

     1      TOM JOSE IAS
            AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,CHIEF
            SECRETARY,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
            SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
 CON.CASE(C) NOs. 2269 & 2269 OF 2019

                                       3



     2      RAJESHKUMAR SINGH IAS
            AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,PRINCIPAL
            SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,DEPARTMENT OF
            AGRICULTURE,SECRETARAIT,
            GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

            SRI.ASHWIN SETHUMADHAVAN - SR.GP




     THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

01.06.2022, ALONG WITH Con.Case(C).2269/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CON.CASE(C) NOs. 2269 & 2269 OF 2019

                                           4




                                     JUDGMENT

Though there are some contentions of the petitioners which require some amount of consideration by the competent Authorities, this Court cannot pass any orders to such effect in a Contempt Case.

2. Presumably being aware of this, the learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that these Contempt Cases be closed with liberty being reserved to their clients to either approach this Court with a petition seeking clarification of the judgments or for a review of the same.

In the afore circumstances, I close these Contempt Cases, with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioners, particularly noticing the specific stand of the learned Senior Government Pleader - Sri.Ashwin Sethumadhavan, that no further benefits can be given to the petitioners.

At this time, the learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that taking advantage of the fact that this Court has now closed these Contempt Cases, the properties of the Corporation is likely to be sold.

I therefore, make it clear that any such action by the competent Authorities shall be deferred for a period of 10 days, so as to enable the petitioners to invoke their alternative remedies as they are advised.

SD/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp