Shankaranarayana Bhat vs Gopalakrishna Prasad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6058 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Shankaranarayana Bhat vs Gopalakrishna Prasad on 1 June, 2022
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
         WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                         RFA NO. 468 OF 2019 (G)
 AGAINST THE FINAL DECREE DATED 23.03.2019 IN FDIA No.100/2016 IN OS
                    No.70/2013 OF SUB COURT, KASARAGOD
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2,4 & 5/DEFENDANTS 2,4 & 5:

     1       SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT, AGED 64 YEARS,
             S/o LATE K.V. PARAMESWARA BHAT,
             RESIDING AT KADAPPU HOUSE, PERLA.P.O.,
             ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK, PIN - 671 552

     2       RAMACHANDRA BHAT, AGED 50 YEARS,
             S/o LATE K.V. PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOSUE,
             PERLA.P.O., ENMAKAJE VILLAGE,
             KASARGOD TALUK, PIN - 671 552

     3       ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS,
             S/o LATE K.V. PARAMESWARA BHAT,
             RESIDING AT KADAPPU HOSUE, PERLA.P.O.,
             ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK, PIN - 671 552

             BY ADVS. P.SHRIHARI
                      M.HARISHARMA


RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1, 3, 6 TO 8 /PLAINTIFF &
DEFENDANTS 1, 3, 6 TO 8:

     1       GOPALAKRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 52 YEARS,
             S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT,
             RESIDING AT KULAKODLU HOUSE, PERADALA P.O.,
             NEERCHAL VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK, PIN - 671 321

     2       K.P.VENKATRAMANA BHAT, AGED 66 YEARS,
             S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, RESIDING AT BEEDIGUDDE
             HOUSE, ENNEMAJALU, PANJA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK,
             D.K.DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE, PIN -574 201

                                                              (DELETED)
 RFA No.468 of 2019 & CO No.10/2020        2



      3       MANJUNATHA BHAT, AGED 58 YEARS,
              S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT,
              RESIDING AT SARPANGALA HOUSE, UKKINADKA P.O.,
              ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK,
              PIN - 671 552                                                 (DELETED)

      4       PARVATHI, AGED 68 YEARS,
              D/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, W/o GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT,
              RESIDING AT KOCHI HOUSE, KUBDAJE VILLAE,
              YETHADKA P.O., KASARGOD, PIN - 671 551         (DELETED)

      5       VIJAYALAXMI, AGED 61 YEARS,
              D/o LATE K.V. PARAMESWARA BHAT, W/o SUBRAGHMANYA BHAT,
              RESIDING AT ONKARAMOOLE, PUNACHA VILLAGE,
              PUTTUR, PIN - 574 243                        (DELETED)

      6       PUSHPAKUMARI, AGED 51 YEARS,
              D/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOUSE,
              PERLA.P.O., ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGOD TALUK,
              PIN - 671 552                                                 (DELETED)

              (RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 ARE DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS
              PER ORDER DATED 12/11/2019 IN I.A 3/19.)

              BY ADVS. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
                       SMT.T.K.SREEKALA
                       KUM.NARAYANI HARIKRISHNAN




      THIS    REGULAR    FIRST       APPEAL   HAVING   COME    UP    FOR    HEARING   ON
01.06.2022,     ALONG    WITH    CO.10/2020,     THE   COURT    ON    THE     SAME    DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RFA No.468 of 2019 & CO No.10/2020    3



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
          WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                              CO NO. 10 OF 2020 (G)
               AGAINST    RFA 468/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
CROSS OBJECTOR/1st RESPONDENT IN RFA:

               GOPALAKRISHNA PRASAD, AGED 52 YEARS,
               S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KULAKODLU HOUSE,
               PERADALA.P.O, NEERCHAL VILLAGE, KASARGODE-671321.

               BY ADVS. K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
                        SMT.T.K.SREEKALA
                        KUM.NARAYANI HARIKRISHNAN


RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS 2 TO 6 IN RFA:

      1        SANKARANARAYANA BHAT, AGED 64 YEARS,
               S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOUSE,
               PERLA.P.O, ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGODE-671552.

      2        RAMACHANDRA BHAT, AGED 50 YEARS,
               S/o LATE.K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOUSE,
               PERLA.P.O, ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGODE-671552.

      3        ASHOK KUMAR, AGED 47 YEARS,
               S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOUSE,
               PERLA.P.O, ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGODE-671552

      4        K.P.VENKATRAMANA BHAT, AGED 66 YEARS,
               S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, BEEDIGUDDE HOUSE,
               ENNEMAJALU, PANJA VILLAGE, PUTTUR.P.O,
               D.K.DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE, PIN-574201.

      5        MANJUNATHA BHAT, AGED 58 YEARS,
               S/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, SARPANGALA HOUSE,
               UKKINADKA.P.O, ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGODE-671552.
 RFA No.468 of 2019 & CO No.10/2020   4



      6       PARVATHI, AGED 68 YEARS,
              D/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, W/o GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT,
              KOCHI HOUSE, KUBDAJE VILLAGE,
              YETHADKA.P.O, KASARGODE-671551.

      7       VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT,
              W/o SUBRAGHMANYA BHAT, ONKARAMOOLE,
              PUNACHA VILLAGE, PUTTUR.P.O, PIN-574243.

      8       PUSHPAKUMARI, AGED 51 YEARS,
              D/o LATE K.V.PARAMESWARA BHAT, KADAPPU HOUSE,
              PERLA.P.O, ENMAKAJE VILLAGE, KASARGODE-672552.

              BY ADV P.SHRIHARI




      THIS CROSS OBJECTION/CROSS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 01.06.2022, ALONG WITH RFA.468/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RFA No.468 of 2019 & CO No.10/2020        5




                                     JUDGMENT

Against the final decree, both the plaintiff and defendants came up in appeal and in cross objection aggrieved by the various allotments made under the final decree. The grievance of the defendants is that the entire dry land/garden land was allotted to the share of plaintiff and what is allotted to the share of defendants is only a wet land (paddy field). The final decree was also brought under challenge by the plaintiff on the ground that no proper means of access was provided to the respective properties. Hence, the final decree is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the trial court for passing the final decree in terms of the preliminary decree. The parties shall appear before the trial court on 15.06.2022. The trial court shall expedite the disposal of the final decree application within a time schedule of five months RFA No.468 of 2019 & CO No.10/2020 6 from the date of appearance of the parties.

Appeal and the cross appeal will stand allowed accordingly.

Sd/-

P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-